Saving A Primary School Teacher in Hong Kong from Political Persecution
Ms Alpais Lam Wai-sze, a primary school teacher in Hong Kong, is being politically persecuted after shouting obscenity in an argument over police to allow freedom of expression on public space on July 14. Harassment of Lam followed. Huge banners were left at her school calling for her dismissal.
On August 11, The chief executive of Hong Kong Government, urged the Education Bureau to file a report on Ms Lam’s case. The Regional Crime Squad of the police received order to investigate into Lam’s case.
Ms Lam was facing tremendous pressure now and we wish the international community can help.
Report of Ms Lam’s case， available in Internet:
‘Mong Kok crime squad to investigate teacher who swore at police’
South China Morning Post, Hong Kong, August 15, 2013
陳雲在facebook呼籲：
請各位聯署，向美國總統奧巴馬先生請求關注林慧思老師的事情，使她免於港共政府的政治迫害。
請各位在林老師的案件進入香港法院的司法程序之前，向國際求援，請求關注。一旦警方拘捕林老師，案件進入香港法院的司法程序，我們就不方便聯署的了。目前，我們是與港共政府鬥快。
首先，我建議陳教授把聲明中Regional Crime Squad改為District Crime Squad/Mongkok，否則奧巴馬真的發聲的時候，港府又出拒絕引渡斯諾登那一招----名字不正確，屆時奧巴馬又吃悶棍。警隊沒有Regional Crime Squad，只有Regional Crime Unit，而這件案交由旺角重案組處理。其實陳教授為甚麼不發聯署給普京呢？普京最近處理斯諾登事件，打了奧巴馬耳光，正能量提升，比起美國佬支持埃及軍隊，間接造成媲美六四的血腥鎮壓光采得多。美國自顧不暇，就算奧巴馬真的發聲，講出來也口震，還要怕勾起香港人翻侵入電腦的舊賬，所以我懷疑陳雲的神智是否有問題，抑或電力下降想找個機會吸日月精華，發一下電。這次我又開了眼界，我印象中像未聽過有跟司法程序鬥快這回事。其實陳教授也不用鬥快，除非他的做法會產生substantial risk of serious prejudice，否則不用怕sub judice而被控藐視法庭。
不知陳教授會不會把林老師youtube那條片一起放在聲明裏，我在想，奧巴馬看了會不會問駐港領事，香港警察沒有裝備taser gun嗎？如果發生在美國，她在封鎖區叫囂，可能給tasered，然後倒地反鎖了，當她拔出手機的時候，分分鐘警察以為她拔出大殺傷力武器，轟她十幾槍。
吓！靠嚇！標少以前寫過三篇美國的東西：警權過大？ ，當自由神閉上眼睛的時候----從Florence案看美國人權 ，過分武力 Excessive Force。你自己看好了。
唉 ！講到尾都是梁之過，所以林老師罵娘，我只好罵梁。我不是斯文人，以前路見不平，罵得太多，現在從良，連國罵也罵不出口，以免給人翻底牌，加上又看過兩眼孔夫子，知道甚麼叫慎獨。呸！不是腎毒，不用排毒。
還有，這篇聲明的英文.....唉又扯遠了。
不知陳教授會不會把林老師youtube那條片一起放在聲明裏，我在想，奧巴馬看了會不會問駐港領事，香港警察沒有裝備taser gun嗎？如果發生在美國，她在封鎖區叫囂，可能給tasered，然後倒地反鎖了，當她拔出手機的時候，分分鐘警察以為她拔出大殺傷力武器，轟她十幾槍。
吓！靠嚇！標少以前寫過三篇美國的東西：警權過大？ ，當自由神閉上眼睛的時候----從Florence案看美國人權 ，過分武力 Excessive Force。你自己看好了。
唉 ！講到尾都是梁之過，所以林老師罵娘，我只好罵梁。我不是斯文人，以前路見不平，罵得太多，現在從良，連國罵也罵不出口，以免給人翻底牌，加上又看過兩眼孔夫子，知道甚麼叫慎獨。呸！不是腎毒，不用排毒。
還有，這篇聲明的英文.....唉又扯遠了。
標少，
回覆刪除陳雲有名你叫，做人好鬼“陳“，做嘢一舊“雲“！
你近期見的香港“老師“，“教授“就是這水平！
一個二個似怒火街頭的“喪師“，一味煽惑的“教仇“，
精神病人变英雌英雄，香港快死！
粉絲仔
He wandered lonely as a cloud
刪除Feels high after taking pills
When all at once he saw a crowd
A bunch, of grass fed imbeciles
Chan is deranged. I have no idea why people take him seriously. In a sane society, he would be the laughing stock and receive no attention at all. In an insane society, these people are viruses that would corrupt people without the ability to think clearly and critically.
回覆刪除"一旦警方拘捕林老師，案件進入香港法院的司法程序，我們就不方便聯署的了". This is just insane.
In a free society, we have all sorts of people who can glorify their heroes or heroines though some of them look like having taken heroin. In that line of thought, you can see some become addicted. Then it is difficult to kick the habit. It is the formation of craze.
回覆刪除不久前在WE THE PEOPLE有中文請願將中國食品豆腐腦定咸甜味道. 現在又有豆腐腦出來.
回覆刪除Are you kidding?
刪除No, I am not joking. I saw the snap shot photo of the petition a few weeks later.
刪除But when I search for the original on the gov website...only get this
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we...tofu-curd...taste.../X1qmZSgz
A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt
You can still find 豆腐腦 petitions news in other website
http://hb.people.com.cn/BIG5/n/2013/0508/c194063-18617288.html
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/china/130508/china-white-house-mock-petitions
http://usa.people.com.cn/BIG5/n/2013/0510/c241376-21430833.html
Thanks. It meant to be a joke then and so does the professor.
刪除標少不敢認真批評陳雲發起聯署的英文，只是作點感歎，今天卻凑巧看到美國加州州立大學哲學教授王偉雄的評論-----《執正英文才聯署吧！》http://thehousenews.com/politics/%E5%9F%B7%E6%AD%A3%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E6%89%8D%E8%81%AF%E7%BD%B2%E5%90%A7/
回覆刪除還有人這樣寫:陳雲二月請白宮介入奶粉問題，三月香港就有限奶令，發起聯署又唔係哂時間哂錢，唔洗遊行咁辛水辛汗，都係一種嘗試。
回覆刪除唉,真係無眼睇囉. 可能陳雲也這樣想.
請白宮赫宮(Kremlin)都介入，問題解決唔到就自宮做公公。
回覆刪除吳克儉已經打咗梁振英一巴掌，佢都話要讓事件告一段落，個報告好易寫，平舖直敘講間學校點處理就可以交差。除非教育局要釘死林慧思，唔批教師執照畀佢，喺咁就無眼睇。希望梁振英唔好再做蠢事，否則搞到陳雲做啲更蠢嘅事，搞啲咁嘅嘢，即喺叫香港人重温林慧思講粗口的神態，梁振英發聲，便成為箭靶，陳雲發聲又變成幫梁振英擋咗一啲箭。無論想講正義抑或搞陰謀，兩個都喺滿腦是草的盲炳。
陳雲剛在臉書寫：觀音借庫，擇日還神。我兩度借助美國總統奧巴馬先生聲援香港，上次是保護香港嬰兒奶粉，結果得咗；這次是保護林慧思老師和香港言論自由，看這次梁振英黨羽在觀塘的示弱作風，又搞掂咗。
回覆刪除我會擇個日子，去麥當勞食漢堡包，拍照上載，以示酬謝。
美國出面，一試就靈。驅邪趕鬼，唔到你唔信。
講笑定認真？
No university student after taking a basic logic course should commit such stupid logical fallacy. The fallacy is called "affirming the consequent".
刪除If Leung is stupid, then Chan is insane;
Leung is stupid;
Chan is insane.
Although this logic is circular, at least it is valid.
I am afraid I have lost interest in further discussion about Professor Chan and Ms Lam. They have every right to say what they like in their facebook. There are always supporters chipping in for different reasons. If the professor wants to patronize McDonald and gives himself a treat, why not? Let he brag and fall into the abyss of complacency. If he is not kidding, then I am not wise enough to understand.
刪除剛看到學校的聲明,大方而持平,質數遠高於政府、議員或專業評論員。值得一讚。
回覆刪除VL
是梁振英的功勞，有空再寫一篇。
刪除http://www.filady.com.hk/advertisement/ad.php?ap_id=2983
回覆刪除