2013年5月6日星期一

羅范椒芬是費解還是廢話?

湯顯明將出席立會公開聆訊

............
另外,前廉政專員、行會成員羅范椒芬昨出席亞視《時事縱橫》時,直言「報料人」是廉署中人,又質疑該人為何不在湯顯明任內透過制度爆出指控,行為令人費解(puzzling)。她表示,湯顯明事件玷污廉署形象,強調要將他個人行為與廉署一貫專業形象劃清界線
............
(6/5/2013 明報節錄)

羅范椒芬要求廉署報料洩密的人在湯顯明任內透過制度爆出指控,我比她更puzzled。請問她在講甚麼?如果洩密者是一個廉署職員,湯顯明是他/她老闆的老闆,湯顯明的老闆又是他的老友,叫洩密者自己引爆炸死自己嗎?廉署成立時根本沒有想過出現特首與專員朋比為奸的情況,並沒有設立制衡的機制,何來制度提出指控?

就算獨立檢討委員會研究這件事,也不能成立同時制衡特首及廉政專員的機制,不要忘記《基本法》第五十七條所講:香港特別行政區設立廉政公署,獨立工作,對行政長官負責。

三、四十年才一遇的特首與專員同時被指不當,如果是兩人同時貪污,應該怎辦?

2 則留言:

  1. It is easier said than done to whistle blow. Thank of the former Detective Chief Inspector Peter Fox. He was not given whistle blower protection until he had spoken to Tony Jones on ABC's Lateline. For further details about the predicaments he had been in, please watch the last week's Australian Story at ABC's website.

    回覆刪除
  2. True. If I were the ICAC whistle blower, I would also blow to the Fourth Estate. I am not a TV goer. Hardly watch once in a month. So I should say I watch TV once in a blue moon.

    回覆刪除