2013年6月17日星期一

梁振英葉劉淑儀蠢在那裡?

山中寫了斯諾登事態發展 一文,批評梁振英及葉劉淑儀在斯諾登事件起初反應愚蠢,他的讀者不同意,留下這說話:

km says:
六月 17, 2013 at 8:09 am

both Regina Yip and CY Leung are not stupid. Other than urging him to leave HK, what else can they say in order not to embarass HK and Mainkand Authorities?


我講過會寫一篇作回應,所以寫這一篇。

斯諾登事件在香港爆發的時候,梁振英適值在紐約訪問,他一定預期被記者提問,預先盤算回應策略。斯諾登擺明是燙手山芋,可以提升至中美外交層面處理的事件, 梁振英當然要言辭謹慎,不能胡亂講超越身分可講的話,更不能講與中國立場相悖的話,所以他講了10次No Comment。如果選擇不評論,講一兩次No Comment不夠嗎?何必一次又一次去No Comment呢?作為一個有魅力的領導人,就不應有這種失措的表現,他身邊隨員也抵打。隨非這答案是請示中央之後囑咐他講的,否則老早就應該講一切依法處理。依法處理是妙不可言,屹立不倒,無械可擊的一句話。既可凸顯香港法治獨立,會履行港美之間簽訂的協議,又可抵抗美國佬的壓力,還暗地裏揶揄美國佬的侵權監察屬非法行為,講出來又漂亮又鏗鏘,為何不講?

甚麼叫依法處理?依甚麼法?這不是梁振英可細緻講的法律問題,具體由港美之間的法律機構去處理,梁振英根本無需解釋。如果斯諾登抗拒引渡,事件落幕之時,梁振英也落了台。而且「法」這東西,妙極,判人有罪或敗訴的同一法律,在上訴時可以反敗為勝,反雲覆雨都在同一隻手中。依法處理是無人可批評的態度,既具體也含糊,不論民主極權,這是耳熟能詳的說話。幸好梁振英徹悟得快,已改了口。

葉劉淑儀一開始比梁振英更蠢,她當初認為,斯諾登可能不知道港美兩地有司法互助協議,斯諾登若要保障自己,最好離開香港。這種言論,很明顯罔顧法治。香港和34個國家簽處處理逃犯的協議,斯諾登極有可能是《逃犯條例》所針對的逃犯,貴為前保安局長,葉劉淑儀豈不是鼓勵「逃犯」逃亡,逃避法律制裁,這種話可以在心裏講,但不能公開接受訪問時講。而且,香港不是邀請斯諾登到此一遊,叫他在古蹟上面簽名留念,他是來投誠獻寶,你怎可以把腳一伸把他攆走,唉,搞甚麼政黨,冠冕堂皇的話也不懂得講!

比他們更蠢的是傳統民主派,龜縮的龜縮,出來講的人的口吻就像中國外交部的發言人,一句遣責的話也不敢講,怪不得市場佔有率越來越少。見到大佬,甚麼自由民主人權公義,都頓成失憶,顧左右而言他。因為斯諾登可能是中國特務所以你噤聲?指斯諾登是中國特務,是美國佬轉移國民視綫的掩眼法。全世界都有特務工程,否則怎樣收集情報?你又不是美國藉,有需要敵愾同仇嗎?







6 則留言:

  1. They may not be stupid as an ordinary person or low-to-mid level bureaucrats, but as political leaders, they are amongst the stupidest I have ever seen.

    Leung doesn't even need his aides to tell him what to say on this occasion. If he had half a working brain, he'd understand there was nothing else to be said other than "follow the law". Aside from all the gains he could have gotten by saying that, at the very least, it would insulate him from any responsibilities.

    As for Ip Lau, it's very clear that she did not think things through before she opened her big mouth. She did not even think about the political implications. She merely wanted to show off by saying she is more knowledgeable and by extension, smarter, than Snowden. Sadly, this isn't the case, and Snowden had not even graduated high school.

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. The problem with Regina Ip is that she is not truly a person from the security aspect of the system despite being the Director of Immigration and Secretary for Security in the past. The media interviewed her every time when there was anything to do with security affairs. Ip's knowledge is very superficial and inproportionate to her confidence. From time to time we can see anomalous remarks.

      The Hong Kong people should organise another bigger rally to protest and condemn the privacy violations by Uncle Sam. The rally is meant to safeguard democracy and at the same time support the gallant act of Snowden. I am yet to see the "saints" of democracy in HK to show their faces.

      刪除
    2. I'd say Regina Ip is clearly unfit to be a top level bureaucrat, let alone the Chief Executive of any place that has security concerns. Competence aside, she has no integrity.

      Hong Kong people would do not such thing, since they have never organise any big rally concerning their own issues (rally and protesting on the streets are two different things). The saints will not show their faces; they have never said a word about Bradley Manning.

      刪除
    3. Do politicians need integrity?

      Hong Kong political groups should do such thing to make use of the Snowden incident to rally the people, to flare up sentiment for a higher call. They should Occupy American Consulate. It is a warm up exercise for other democratic pursuit movement. What is better than slapping the face of the Americans of their hypocrisy? A move you can rally the people irrespective of their political stance.

      刪除
  2. Bill you should spend less energy and emotions on 傳統民主派. Not just here , your disappointment and frustration is all over your blog. They are out already.It's those of us who can't let go that will later become the 2nd tier 維園阿伯. Just remember that you've already been disillusioned.

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. I just lash out at them when opportunity arises. I don't think disillusioned is the right word. I never (at least for the past umpteen years) have hope in them.

      刪除