國務院6月發表《“一國兩制”在香港特别行政區的實踐》白皮書，惹起頗多爭論，既然有不少人評論過，我本來也不打算講，看世界杯好過看這無聊又充滿矛盾的國策。
真的不明白這些大陸佬的心態，講來講去只懂得講愛國，又把愛國和愛黨混為一談。大陸根本的問題就是沒有權力制衡的制度，一切都由黨指揮，所以它怕香港那種三權分立，尤其是司法獨立，司法獨立是共產黨的眼中釘，因為一獨立，就控制不到。共產黨擺脫不了中國幾千年來的帝制心態，一切朕朱筆一批，就是律令。任憑甚麽憲法國策，黨喜歡怎様釋義都可以，它就忘記了，就算是它自己寫出來，白紙黑字，都講只有人大才有釋法權，那麽國務院這白皮書又憑甚麽去解讀《基本法》呢？共產黨其實一直都在做違反《基本法》的事，人大釋法時是這樣，干擾香港高度自治時是這樣，發表國家政策時也是這様。
香港小學要教授《基本法》，我十分贊同，起碼讓他們認識香港政治法律制度的權力來源。我更加覺得國務院研究香港事務的人，應該學習一下香港用普通法的解釋法律方法，不要啼笑皆非的提出自打嘴巴違反《基本法》的事。這白皮書發表的目的，一言以蔽之，不是叫香港的管治階層，司法獨立的法官，或平民百姓去愛國愛港，而是要所有人愛共產黨，聽從指揮。中國一日沒有獨立的司法制度，不能對管治階層作權力制衡，無論經濟怎樣驕人增長，就只有孕育著計時炸彈，到了維穩不斷也壓制不住百姓不滿的時候，就會爆破，到時共產黨也要滅亡。
如果共產黨滅亡之後，還不能訂立一套能制衡權力的制度來，取而代之的人只會像謀朝篡位那様，打著新的幡旗，依然是以做皇帝的心智來治理國家，一番新景象之後，又回復幾千年帝皇對子民管理的政治模式。香港一些打正民主旗號的人，不也是抱著極權統治者的心態嗎？
我2002年移民，完全與政治無關。看目今的香港，我慶幸意外地買了這保障，捨棄了不少物質，現在看來，當時沒有逃逸，卻偶然地變成具前瞻性的逃兵。我不是講風涼話，當時沒有逃走的心，今日卻坐享逃走了的成。
昨日看到馬恩國出來傳話，引述港澳辦副主任徐澤認為香港大律師公會過度解讀白皮書，強調司法人員宣誓擁護《基本法》和效忠特區，嚴格執行《基本法》，已經是愛國。我即時反應不是徐澤講法的理據，而是：香港的建制派死絕了嗎？馬恩國，為甚麽老是你？他還繼續擔任監警會委員，香港會講粗口的大律師多的是，馬恩國算老幾？還可以容忍再委任他！
昨日看到馬恩國出來傳話，引述港澳辦副主任徐澤認為香港大律師公會過度解讀白皮書，強調司法人員宣誓擁護《基本法》和效忠特區，嚴格執行《基本法》，已經是愛國。我即時反應不是徐澤講法的理據，而是：香港的建制派死絕了嗎？馬恩國，為甚麽老是你？他還繼續擔任監警會委員，香港會講粗口的大律師多的是，馬恩國算老幾？還可以容忍再委任他！
中國模式天下無敵，又何需要一國兩制？
回覆刪除可惜人民政府與人民為敵，共產政權共了人民的產和權。
回覆刪除今日有報導梁愛詩討論白皮書:像交朋友初時客氣,我幾乎眼前一黑,大婆婆呀你講緊的是治國的法律,老千得手都是先扮朋友。這可能是她的真心話。
回覆刪除hi fiving
我會寫一篇評論。
刪除You have written something that I wish to write you in private for some time: your immigration to Australia is really with foresight!!!
回覆刪除David,
刪除That is only accidental.
http://the-sun.on.cc/cnt/news/20140618/00408_003.html
回覆刪除爆粗大狀馬恩國專業失當罪成停牌 - Counsel Lawrence Ma Guilty of Professional Misconduct and Suspended
舊年二月喺立法會一個聽證會上，馬恩國大律師 (Barrister Lawrence Ma) 因為以英文粗口鬧爆議員「長毛」梁國雄而遭投訴，大律師公會 (Hong Kong Bar Association) 隨即對佢進行紀律研訊。研訊前後搞咗年幾，馬大狀上周四終於收到公會嘅書面通知，判罰佢就「爆粗」事件停牌一個月，兼繳清研訊涉及嘅律師費用，相信十幾二十萬元一定走唔甩。馬大狀就自嘲即日暫改稱「釘牌大狀」。
http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20140619/bkn-20140619110838600-0619_00822_001.html
回覆刪除http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking_news_detail.asp?id=50922&icid=3&d_str=20140619
逾百律師會會員向林新強律師提不信任動議
【on.cc東網專訊】律師會會長林新強律師日前評論國務院發表的一國兩制白皮書時表示，法官愛國亦不影響香港司法獨立，言論引起外界關注。律師會憲制及人權事務委員會委員任建峰及資深事務律師蔡家玲在電台節目表示，不滿林新強有關言論，已收集逾百名律師會會員簽名，要求召開特別會員大會，並提出3個動議，包括要求律師會重申白皮書對香港一國兩制、高度自治、及司法獨立是否有影響、以及要求林新強收回有關言論、及向林新強提出不信任動議。
Law Society Chairman (Solicitor Ambrose Lam) Urged to Step Down
(The Standard) (June 19th, 2014)
More than 100 members of the Law Society of Hong Kong have signed a joint petition calling for the Society's chairman, Solicitor Ambrose Lam, to step down.
Lawyer Ambrose Lam has been criticized for supporting the White Paper published by the State Council last week that stated Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy was subject to the authority of the central government in Beijing. The Paper also stipulated that all judges should be patriotic.
In response, Solicitor Ambrose Lam said the requirement for judges to be patriotic did not undermine the rule of law and he saw no problem in regarding the judiciary as being part of the government's "administrators".
The petitioners accused Solicitor Ambrose Lam of not doing enough to uphold judicial independence.
A member of the Hong Kong Law Society's Constitutional and Human Rights Committee, Yam Kin-fung, said he would move a motion of no confidence against Solicitor Ambrose Lam on Friday.
What do you think of this development?
刪除What Lam recently said is obviously a disgrace. A motion moved him to step down is a legal and political wrangle. The most ludicrous thing he said was about defining patriotism. He is a sycophant.
刪除林新強事務律師話共產黨好偉大，我覺得好嘔心。咁都講得出，林新強事務律師仲有乜野嘔心野做唔出？ (林新强事务律师话共产党好伟大，我觉得好呕心。 咁都讲得出，林新强事务律师仲有乜野呕心野做唔出？)
刪除Solicitor Ambrose Lam can say just about anything in public without feeling ashamed of himself. This, in my view, is simply disgusting.
刪除An update on Barrister Lawrence Ma, the disgraceful and dishonourable lawyer, for you: -
回覆刪除http://hkba.org/the-bar/discipline/bdt/Decision%20on%20Sentence%2020140612.pdf
...The seriousness of the misconduct
22. First, the misconduct was sufficiently serious (and very serious, if necessary) to warrant suspension, albeit for a short period, having regard to the circumstances:-
(1) Barrister Lawrence Ma used highly offensive language, repeatedly, on a formal occasion, in a public place. Such language included "You are not a bloody Chinese" and "You are not even a fucking Chinese". Such offensive language was not strictly "one off ", but took place over several minutes. He must have known that being in the Legislative Council, his words and conduct would be recorded and easily publicized and accessible by the public.
(2) Although his misconduct was not in the course of his practice as he appeared in his capacity as the Vice Chairman of the Association of Hong Kong Professionals, it was apparent and he made clear, that he was a Hong Kong Barrister. The consequence of his highly unusual conduct was dearly to bring the profession of barrister (and himself) into disrepute, and to damage the public's trust in barristers. On the evidence, the Bar was "swamped with complaints", with at least 279 complaints lodged by members of the public.
The Bar's reputation depends on the dignity and high standing of its members. Mr. Ma's conduct was disgraceful and dishonourable. It was also aggravated by his highly patronizing language and demeanour which made clear that he considered himself superior because he was a barrister and had "credentials", unlike Mr. Leung...
39. For all the reasons above, in our discretion, this Tribunal orders as follows :-
(1) Counsel Lawrence Ma be suspended from practising as a barrister in Hong Kong for 1 month from the date immediately upon the expiry of the period of appeal against this Tribunal's decision and in the event of an appeal, from the date of disposal of the appeal...