收費代做小學功課 網站稱為學生減壓
【明報專訊】消除學生功課壓力也成為商機。本報發現10多個網頁及社交網站推銷代做功課，除了代做大學論文，甚至可代做中小學功課，聲稱「學校壓力的完美的解決方案」。本報記者上周三（20日）要求其中一個網站代做一篇80字的英文作文，網站負責人即日交貨，收費75元。教育局回應表示，聘請別人代做功課的行為應予杜絕。有教師批評代做功課「可恥」，勸學生不要「請槍」，免失去學習機會。
聲稱代筆者具碩士學歷
本報發現10多個網站、facebook及instagram帳戶推銷代做功課，有些是按時收費，每分鐘2.5元，亦有以字數計算等。當中一個網站聲稱是「全港最大代做功課網站」、「學校壓力的完美的解決方案」，已為超過100名學生提供服務。
本報上周以顧客身分聯絡該網站，20多歲、聲稱在美國大學畢業的負責人Lawrence回覆稱，該網數個月前成立，按時收費，每分鐘2.5元，代筆者具碩士學歷，但他最終沒有供學歷證明。記者以小六生的親友身分，要求他代做一篇80字的英文作文，他即日交貨，寫了79字的作文收費75元（見另稿）。
Lawrence稱，該網主要替大專學生做畢業習作，每篇需6至7小時（即900至1050元），亦可達9至10小時，另有中學及小學生要求代做功課，包括有小五生要求代作文，要到銀行入數付款。
稱提供功課只作參考
本報其後以記者身分向上述網站查詢，對方以WhatsApp回覆稱，代做功課無問題，「只是現在眾多服務中其中一種」，亦可為學生減壓，強調提供的功課只作參考，「至於學生有沒有自己更改內容及提交，並不能控制」。他說，很多家長和補習教師都會代做功課，該網站會在服務前加入條款，確保學生知悉功課只作參考用途。
另外，本報要求另一facebook專頁代寫社會科學系的2500字論文，獲回覆「無人手安排到」、「我地（哋）功課排到6月了」，以及該學科人手較少。
教師：代做可恥 失學習機會
資深通識科教師方景樂批評，賣功課網可恥，學生請槍問題性質非常嚴重，必須懲處。他提醒學生若請槍，「永世唔會透過呢個學習拎到個能力」，即使「呃埋DSE考試」，在職場最終也會吃虧。
教局：應杜絕 家校會：或因競爭文化
家校會主席湯修齊認為，代做功課未必與功課多有關，學生或因競爭文化追逐分數而找人代做。他說，家長須檢視自己對子女的關心會否變成壓力，造成反彈，認為家長與校方應教導，做功課屬學習過程。
教育局發言人回覆稱，聘請別人代做功課的行為應予杜絕。若學生面對學習困難或生活規律欠佳未能完成家課，或逃避做家課責任，學校和家長需要合力尋求方法予學生支援，助他們克服困難和分配時間完成功課，並予以鼓勵，提升學習自信。
【明報專訊】消除學生功課壓力也成為商機。本報發現10多個網頁及社交網站推銷代做功課，除了代做大學論文，甚至可代做中小學功課，聲稱「學校壓力的完美的解決方案」。本報記者上周三（20日）要求其中一個網站代做一篇80字的英文作文，網站負責人即日交貨，收費75元。教育局回應表示，聘請別人代做功課的行為應予杜絕。有教師批評代做功課「可恥」，勸學生不要「請槍」，免失去學習機會。
聲稱代筆者具碩士學歷
本報發現10多個網站、facebook及instagram帳戶推銷代做功課，有些是按時收費，每分鐘2.5元，亦有以字數計算等。當中一個網站聲稱是「全港最大代做功課網站」、「學校壓力的完美的解決方案」，已為超過100名學生提供服務。
本報上周以顧客身分聯絡該網站，20多歲、聲稱在美國大學畢業的負責人Lawrence回覆稱，該網數個月前成立，按時收費，每分鐘2.5元，代筆者具碩士學歷，但他最終沒有供學歷證明。記者以小六生的親友身分，要求他代做一篇80字的英文作文，他即日交貨，寫了79字的作文收費75元（見另稿）。
Lawrence稱，該網主要替大專學生做畢業習作，每篇需6至7小時（即900至1050元），亦可達9至10小時，另有中學及小學生要求代做功課，包括有小五生要求代作文，要到銀行入數付款。
稱提供功課只作參考
本報其後以記者身分向上述網站查詢，對方以WhatsApp回覆稱，代做功課無問題，「只是現在眾多服務中其中一種」，亦可為學生減壓，強調提供的功課只作參考，「至於學生有沒有自己更改內容及提交，並不能控制」。他說，很多家長和補習教師都會代做功課，該網站會在服務前加入條款，確保學生知悉功課只作參考用途。
另外，本報要求另一facebook專頁代寫社會科學系的2500字論文，獲回覆「無人手安排到」、「我地（哋）功課排到6月了」，以及該學科人手較少。
教師：代做可恥 失學習機會
資深通識科教師方景樂批評，賣功課網可恥，學生請槍問題性質非常嚴重，必須懲處。他提醒學生若請槍，「永世唔會透過呢個學習拎到個能力」，即使「呃埋DSE考試」，在職場最終也會吃虧。
教局：應杜絕 家校會：或因競爭文化
家校會主席湯修齊認為，代做功課未必與功課多有關，學生或因競爭文化追逐分數而找人代做。他說，家長須檢視自己對子女的關心會否變成壓力，造成反彈，認為家長與校方應教導，做功課屬學習過程。
教育局發言人回覆稱，聘請別人代做功課的行為應予杜絕。若學生面對學習困難或生活規律欠佳未能完成家課，或逃避做家課責任，學校和家長需要合力尋求方法予學生支援，助他們克服困難和分配時間完成功課，並予以鼓勵，提升學習自信。
(24/4/2016)
這是一則令人爆笑的新聞, 小學功課請槍請到商業化確是有生意頭腦, 香港乜都有, 千奇百怪。我讀過四間小學, 現在全部執晒笠, 我只記得其中三間的名字和位置, 第一間是不同年級同班上課的, 那是會困黑房的年代, 邊個孬就困入去一陣, 依家邊有人知啲咁嘢。
以前讀小學無乜功課做, 當然可能我記錯只係自己無乜做, 所以少年不知愁滋味, 今時今日的小朋友, 邊有快樂可言, 時常看着起跑線, 一出世就準備就緒, 開始比拼, 連發夢的空間也沒有, 了無生趣。
以前唔做唔交功課, 默書測驗唔合格, 就會罰抄及打手板。那是可以體罰的年代, 老豆老母會同先生講, 佢孬你幫我打下佢, 先生老實不客氣一於聽晒家長話。今時今日, 做老師鬧人啲仔女, 分分鐘畀人去學校摑幾巴, 打一兩鑊, 打人個仔監都有得你坐。我最鍾意打手板, 乾淨利落, 打完就乜都唔使做, 兩不相欠。先生打手板梗係唔會用自己隻手嚟打, 而係叫教木工的先生刨了一條好似雞髀型嘅木頭嚟打, 都好鬼痛, 不過標少硬頂, 不哼一聲, 痛到入心, 男兒有淚不輕彈, 打到隻手好似着咗火咁, 都未喊過又未求過情要打少幾下, 又唔會出貓以圖合格, 又唔會點讀書喎, 所以長打長有, 罰抄也長罰長有。同班老友講兒時往事, 有條友仲過瘾, 罰抄唔抄, 加倍一樣唔抄, 加多幾倍, 睬你都傻。見家長, 唔得閒, 終於掛住個牌在胸前, 寫住「大懶蟲」, 掛咗一日, 罰抄一筆勾消。條友仔EQ好到爆, 一個人成日走去流浪, 烽煙四起的地方去勻晒, 珠峯base camp都去過。做完癌症手術已計劃環遊世界。
明報另一篇新聞, 陸大狀話或涉「串謀詐騙」 「槍手」學生可被控, 我同老婆講咁就要拉晒你全家, indictable offence無time bar, 事關佢細佬讀小學時, 有一年到放完暑假前一晚先至講幾本暑期作業一頁都無做過, 於是兩老總動員幾個家姐一齊做, 做完可以每人一碗雲吞麵, 又串謀又同謀, 仲唔死。呢條友仔依家係大學教書, 有兩個PhD, 咪又係無做功課請槍手。
時代唔同晒, 依家一出世就競爭到死, 功課做到癲, 佢哋真係比上一代叻好多? 我還很嚮往快樂的童年, 乜都唔識, 淨係發白日夢, 日日做街童, 返學最鍾意就係上體育, 暑假就去做童工, 一早就識煮飯, 依家啲細路比我哋嗰陣幸福啲嗎?
明報另一篇新聞, 陸大狀話或涉「串謀詐騙」 「槍手」學生可被控, 我同老婆講咁就要拉晒你全家, indictable offence無time bar, 事關佢細佬讀小學時, 有一年到放完暑假前一晚先至講幾本暑期作業一頁都無做過, 於是兩老總動員幾個家姐一齊做, 做完可以每人一碗雲吞麵, 又串謀又同謀, 仲唔死。呢條友仔依家係大學教書, 有兩個PhD, 咪又係無做功課請槍手。
時代唔同晒, 依家一出世就競爭到死, 功課做到癲, 佢哋真係比上一代叻好多? 我還很嚮往快樂的童年, 乜都唔識, 淨係發白日夢, 日日做街童, 返學最鍾意就係上體育, 暑假就去做童工, 一早就識煮飯, 依家啲細路比我哋嗰陣幸福啲嗎?
What do you think about Elizabeth Quat's diploma mill degrees? Can she be prosecuted for any crime under the laws of Hong Kong for using diploma mill degrees in LegCo elections?
回覆刪除https://webb-site.com/articles/quat.asp
It's time to take down another legislator for overstating their qualifications. Readers may recall that in 2005, Webb-site asked LegCo's Committee on Member's Interests to investigate the degree-mill qualifications of "Dr" Philip Wong Yu-hong. They decided that the matter was outside their jurisdiction, and that the Advisory Guidelines on Matters of Ethics are unenforceable. However, as a result of our complaint, the Committee did eventually amend the guidelines in 2005, so that the current version states:
"A Member should ensure that the personal information (e.g. qualifications) he provides to the Council (including the Legislative Council Secretariat) is correct and true."
Now, fast forward to 2014, and "Dr" The Honourable Elizabeth Quat Pui Fan, JP of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of HK, claims on her LegCo biography page to be a "Doctor of Philosophy (Management)". In biographies elsewhere on the internet, in her election biography for the Chief Executive Election Committee, she also claimed a "BBA and MBA in Marketing". But nowhere could we find a statement of where these qualifications were obtained. So Webb-site wrote to her office, and her assistant replied that the degrees were:
1993 Bachelor in Business Administration (Greenwich University, Hawaii)
1994 Master of Business Administration (Greenwich University, Hawaii)
1996 Doctor of Philosophy, Management (Greenwich University, Hawaii)
Ah yes, Greenwich University, Hawaii. We can tell you a thing or two about that.
In no way is it related to the legitimate University of Greenwich (formerly Thames Polytechnic) in England. Greenwich University, Inc. (GUI) was incorporated in Hawaii on 2-Feb-1990. It never received any accreditation from an accreditation body recognised by the US Department of Education. That makes it a degree mill by our measure. Its officers included Marjorie Fishman, Pauline Butler and one "John Walsh of Brannagh" (John Walsh). It operated out of this bungalow at 103 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii, then home of Douglass L Capogrossi, President of Greenwich University (yes, that's Douglass with two esses).
If you think that her degrees were bogus ones, you can report to the police. She may have contravened the election law.
刪除I read this information before and read the link too when someone posted the same in another blog.
我覺得葛珮帆去野雞大學買學位好 Cheap 囉！香港太多呢啲呃神騙鬼嘅 Cheap 人。
刪除自卑的人沒有實力以虛銜搭夠, 擁有不知所謂的學位好似用個A貨手袋自覺高貴。
刪除如果我冇記錯既話，香港係冇虛假學歷一條罪名，之前入罪都係以行使虛假文書入罪。
刪除那位朋友既然份文件係「真」既話，咁有冇可能入到佢? 而香港係冇法例界定什麼資格先可以有Dr. (係PhD既 Doctor, 唔係Medical Doctor)既稱號。
Diploma Mill 可以有排講，而標少介唔介意用戴展華一案解釋一下虛假學歷係點樣入罪? 等大家分清楚乜野先算係可入罪既虛假學歷。
戴展華以虛假文書騙取專業註冊, 性質與葛的完全不同。葛的是「流」學位, 唯一有可能違反的是選舉舞弊條例, 要證明也不易, 她真實地陳述了擁有一串「流」學位, 一個毫無價值的學歷, 她沒有假冒甚麼真正的大學畢業, 這種人格是典型的愛字頭狗黨。
刪除戴案的幾條控罪:
2. Tai Chin Wah appeared for trial before His Honour Judge Britton on a charge sheet which contained five charges. The first charge was that of uttering a forged document, contrary to section 74(1) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap.200 - "the Ordinance". Its particulars alleged that Tai Chin Wah, on or about 6th May 1983, at the office of the Law Society of Hong Kong, uttered a forged document: namely a document purporting to be a Law Society of England and Wales Certificate of passing the Solicitors' Final Examination. The Certificate was dated 26th November 1982. It was alleged that Tai Chin Wah - whom we shall from hereon called the respondent - knew it to be forged and had the intent to deceive.
3. The second charge was a similar offence and its particulars were that on 6th June 1983, also at the office of the Law Society of Hong Kong, the respondent uttered a forged document: namely a document purporting to be a letter from the Law Society of England and Wales dated 30th May 1983 knowing that it was forged and with intent to deceive.
4. The third charge was that of making a false statutory declaration, contrary to section 36(a) of the Ordinance. Its particulars alleged that the respondent, on 16th May 1983, in Hong Kong, in a declaration which was entitled "a Declaration as to Service under Articles" made under the Oaths and Declarations Ordinance, knowingly and willfully made a statement which was false in a material particular, that is that he had complied with the requirements of rule 14(b) of the Articled Clerks Rules as to the passing of examinations. The fourth charge was possession of a forged document, contrary to section 76(3) of the Ordinance, and its particulars alleged that the respondent, on 7th October 1991, at his home had in his custody without lawful authority or excuse a forged document, which he knew to be forged; namely a Law Society of England and Wales Certificate of passing the Solicitors' Final Examination which certificate was dated 26th November 1982.
5. The fifth and final charge was also that of possession of a forged document and its particulars alleged that he, on 7th October 1991, at his home had in his custody or possession without lawful authority or excuse forged documents, that is writing paper of the Law Society of England and Wales which he knew to be forged.
(CAAR 5/1992)
所以佢個學位得啖笑，而用佢個學位而圍攻佢既人更加得啖笑
刪除http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/1993/20.html
刪除68. We have no doubt at all that an immediate custodial sentence should have been imposed by the sentencing judge, and of greater length than the 6 months imprisonment he thought appropriate. That was manifestly inadequate. It was wrong in principle to suspend. We would assess the proper sentence now to be 9 months imprisonment concurrent on each charge. We would allow the Attorney General's review and make that order.
_______
What do you think of the sentence of 9-months' imprisonment for Tai Chin Wah the dishonest (and disgusting) former solicitor? Way too lenient I would have thought?
It is extremely lenient. The starting point should be several years instead of several months. What happens if we have a fake judge? It is possible along that line of thought, submitting forged documents to become a lawyer then apply to sit as a judge.
刪除論呃人嘅騙子，我覺得戴展華其實仲衰過陳振聰. When it comes to fraudsters, I think Tai Chin Wah is worse than Tony Chan Chun Chuen (now known as Peter Chan).
刪除http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20160426/bkn-20160426104554591-0426_00822_001.html
刪除虛報擁航空醫學文憑 西醫柯力華認專業失德
於愉景灣執業的普通課私家醫生柯力華(Oliver James Alan)，涉於信件簽名印章誤稱擁有航空醫學文憑，以及把未獲醫務委員會認可的航空醫學證書履歷寫在醫療網站 www.islandhealth.com.hk 。柯力華代表律師今早在醫務委員會紀律研訊上認罪。醫委會今日裁定柯3項專業失德罪名成立，向他發警告信，以及停牌1個月，延期12個月執行。
~~~ This Dr James Alan Oliver is also disgusting.
Isn't it a bit lenient to him?
刪除In fact, the concept of 請槍 come from china, china has a long history of that.
回覆刪除Ghostwriter(槍手) may not necessarily originated from China. It appears in many forms and is so common worldwide.
刪除我唔記得在邊度(應該係霍韜晦寫既)見到一篇文章，大約話現在既人只會專注專業技能既發展上，而忽略左道德及思惟上既發展。當全世界既人只關心佢能否用佢既技能(例如學歷)而搵到大錢既時候，冇人會再理會佢地獲得此技能既方法。所以先會衍生出請槍既行業。
回覆刪除依家社會出現左好多表面出好有學識與學歷，但實際係完全冇常識同知識既人。例如依家那班港獨人士，雖然話哂係大學生，但係一聽佢地講既就知佢地講野唔make sense。
講開請槍，小弟十幾年前在美國讀書既時候真係見過有人請槍考試，而個professor又唔係好理。好彩美國大學唔興拉curve，否則我一定會出聲....
「好彩美國大學唔興拉 curve，「否則」我一定會出聲」，「忽略左道德及思惟上既發展」，霍韜晦說得太對了。咁識做，點夠你撈呀。
刪除指責人地唔道德是否建立道德既一部分？係既話唔怪得依家香港成為投訴之都了
刪除This happened in a USA state university some forty years ago. In a biology class, the professer assigned each student a seat on the first day of class and we had to take the same seat throughout the semester, so that his teaching assistant will take attendance in every class. In the final exam, a man took the seat of a girl next to me. When I submitted my test paper, I gave the professor a note telling him that the seat to my right used to be taken up by a girl, not a man. The professor thanked me. I guess the TA did not find out that the man was a fake test taker because all he did was to check which seats were vacant. So, when a seat was taken, he assumed that the person was a student taking the class.
刪除A few days later, I was invited to the student discipline office for an interview and asked to described what happened.
A few weeks later, the girl next to me saw me on campus and approached me. She said she knew that it was me who reported on her and made her fail the course........ I replied that cheating on examinations was wrong and she should not talk to me like that, then I walked away.
I thought she smacked you.
刪除It is curious. So, except you, the other students sitting around the girl did not notice the fake, or they just turned away from it.
刪除No, she did not smack me. I think she knew the consequence and dared not do that.
刪除I found two grammatical errors in my response above:
1. "...so that his teaching assistant will take attendance" - "will" should be "would".
2. "I was invited to the student discipline office for an interview and asked to described what happened." - "to described" should be "to describe".
To Anonymous @9:46 - I had no knowledge of whether or not any other students were aware of the fake or had reported the case to the professor.
而我所知,香港中小學生的功課都非常多,多得呼吸不了,連休閒活動丶其他興趣也沒有時間發展。學校缺乏訓練批判思考丶培養各種才能丶人格的發展或對社會的關心, 一天到晚就是背東西, 我覺得是糟蹋學生,頗可悲的。劍
回覆刪除工廠式的產物。
刪除現實係無師自通既人非常少見.如果大部份唔讀書既人成績係可以好過有讀書既,呢個世界又點會咁多人番學?
回覆刪除無人講無師自通, 只是講不要以逼死人的方法學習, 要留點個人發夢幻想的空間。
刪除其實人一生有没成就唔係剩睇讀書，而讀書叻唔叻先天後天都有關係，我見唔少，小學焗到出牙血，入到名校，到中學就沒晒氣
刪除