「摸骨」變摸胸 補習教師認非禮
【明報專訊】曾因非禮而被判囚21個月的補習教師，透過微信認識17歲女生，藉詞「摸骨」相約卻變成「摸胸」。他到女生家中，伸手入其內衣非禮其胸部，女生仍啞忍，繼續讓補習教師到其家中「摸骨」兩次，女生與家人談起才驚覺被非禮。補習教師昨承認3項非禮罪，據悉他曾以「睇風水」為由干犯同類型案件。
控罪指，被告戴旭輝（48歲）去年8月、今年6月及8月三度到事主X（17歲）的家中非禮X。案情指出，戴前年透過微信認識事主X，訛稱「識睇掌」，曾相約X「睇掌」，及後以「摸骨」為由到X家中，雙手伸進X的內衣，觸摸X的背部及胸部，X曾感到被侵犯而叫停，但戴繼續，X感到害怕但沒有阻止。戴及後重施故技，兩度再到X家中以「摸骨」為名觸摸X的胸部。至本月21日，X與家人討論有關性騷擾事件，才發覺被侵犯而報警，警方同日拘捕戴。
戴在錄影會面中承認，以「摸骨」為藉口觸摸事主的胸部，但他不懂得任何關於風水的事。辯方求情指出，被告患妄想被迫害症多年，有精神病紀錄，曾到精神病院接受治療。控方指出，被告有兩次同類刑事定罪紀錄，其中一次被判監21個月。據悉，其中一次案底，被告曾向事主訛稱是風水師，借「睇相」為名非禮事主。
裁判官將案押後至下月6日，待索取被告的背景、心理及兩份精神科報告後判刑，其間還押監房看管。
【案件編號：KTCC5019/15】
我弄不清究竟是香港特别多非禮案，抑或傳媒過份喜歡報導涉非禮的案件，幾乎每天都不乏這種新聞。上面這則是涉及一個補習教師的，犯案時他並非替受害人補習而借故非禮，不算違反誠信，不會是加重刑罰的因素。不過，這卻不是年輕男女，年齡相若的網上交友那種，48歳相對於17歲，而且也具預謀，被告不懂風水掌相，卻藉此作為引子。這少女也缺乏謹慎，讓這網上結識的人一再上門。少女的心事我不懂，法例上並没有特别刑罰訂明來保護對少年的非禮，一般只靠個别法官自己的看法去懲處。這少女透過微信結識被告，給非禮了一次，還㑹繼續來往，豈不教人疑惑。網上交友已夠危險，還讓他登堂入室，簡直是自招麻煩。就等如你明知信不過的人，就要疏遠, 所謂防微杜漸，以免姑息養奸。微信，都有另一意思，即信少少就夠。
這被告有兩次同類案底，我只找到他提出上訴那一件，案情如下：
1. 上訴人在審訊後被裁定一項「猥褻侵犯罪」罪名成立，被判處21 個月監禁刑罰。上訴人現不服判刑，提出上訴。
2. 案發於1996 年，控方證人當時15 歲，是一名中四學生，參加暑期義工服務，她本校的老師因外遊將她及其他學生交託上訴人照顧。上訴人是另一學校的老師，推薦證人參加義工嘉許計劃，相約她到一間社區中心內，聲稱進行體能、智能及情緒智商測試。在該中心之內，上訴人佯稱替證人進行簡單的身體檢查，伸手進入其上衣，撫摸她的胸部，又著令她脫去上衣，除去胸圍，用雙手撫摸她的胸部及身體上各部分，更伸手進入證人的內褲內，觸摸證人的臀部。
3. 上訴人在兩個月後向證人表示有關的義工嘉許計劃已胎死腹中。當時證人因不欲父母得知事件遭到怪責，只向老師提及此事，並沒有報案。她延至2006 年才向警方舉報。
(香港特別行政區 訴 戴旭輝 HCMA27/2008)
很明顯以前這被告是中學教師，1996年發生的非禮，受害人到成年之後才報案，足足10 年，增加了檢控的難度，但非禮是可公訴罪行(indictable offence)，起訴期没有時限(no time bar)，故此有些控訴是幾十年後才提出的， 悉尼牙醫在審訊中這件是一例，追溯到1973年。
這9周囚禁並不算重手，案情指被告在72 年曾侵犯過女童。當然遇上充满判刑藝術的上訴法官，改判罰款也不為奇，只是不能判緩刑，因為非禮屬例外罪行(excepted offence)。
【明報專訊】曾因非禮而被判囚21個月的補習教師，透過微信認識17歲女生，藉詞「摸骨」相約卻變成「摸胸」。他到女生家中，伸手入其內衣非禮其胸部，女生仍啞忍，繼續讓補習教師到其家中「摸骨」兩次，女生與家人談起才驚覺被非禮。補習教師昨承認3項非禮罪，據悉他曾以「睇風水」為由干犯同類型案件。
控罪指，被告戴旭輝（48歲）去年8月、今年6月及8月三度到事主X（17歲）的家中非禮X。案情指出，戴前年透過微信認識事主X，訛稱「識睇掌」，曾相約X「睇掌」，及後以「摸骨」為由到X家中，雙手伸進X的內衣，觸摸X的背部及胸部，X曾感到被侵犯而叫停，但戴繼續，X感到害怕但沒有阻止。戴及後重施故技，兩度再到X家中以「摸骨」為名觸摸X的胸部。至本月21日，X與家人討論有關性騷擾事件，才發覺被侵犯而報警，警方同日拘捕戴。
戴在錄影會面中承認，以「摸骨」為藉口觸摸事主的胸部，但他不懂得任何關於風水的事。辯方求情指出，被告患妄想被迫害症多年，有精神病紀錄，曾到精神病院接受治療。控方指出，被告有兩次同類刑事定罪紀錄，其中一次被判監21個月。據悉，其中一次案底，被告曾向事主訛稱是風水師，借「睇相」為名非禮事主。
裁判官將案押後至下月6日，待索取被告的背景、心理及兩份精神科報告後判刑，其間還押監房看管。
【案件編號：KTCC5019/15】
(24/10/2015)
這被告有兩次同類案底，我只找到他提出上訴那一件，案情如下：
1. 上訴人在審訊後被裁定一項「猥褻侵犯罪」罪名成立，被判處21 個月監禁刑罰。上訴人現不服判刑，提出上訴。
2. 案發於1996 年，控方證人當時15 歲，是一名中四學生，參加暑期義工服務，她本校的老師因外遊將她及其他學生交託上訴人照顧。上訴人是另一學校的老師，推薦證人參加義工嘉許計劃，相約她到一間社區中心內，聲稱進行體能、智能及情緒智商測試。在該中心之內，上訴人佯稱替證人進行簡單的身體檢查，伸手進入其上衣，撫摸她的胸部，又著令她脫去上衣，除去胸圍，用雙手撫摸她的胸部及身體上各部分，更伸手進入證人的內褲內，觸摸證人的臀部。
3. 上訴人在兩個月後向證人表示有關的義工嘉許計劃已胎死腹中。當時證人因不欲父母得知事件遭到怪責，只向老師提及此事，並沒有報案。她延至2006 年才向警方舉報。
(香港特別行政區 訴 戴旭輝 HCMA27/2008)
很明顯以前這被告是中學教師，1996年發生的非禮，受害人到成年之後才報案，足足10 年，增加了檢控的難度，但非禮是可公訴罪行(indictable offence)，起訴期没有時限(no time bar)，故此有些控訴是幾十年後才提出的， 悉尼牙醫在審訊中這件是一例，追溯到1973年。
Ex-Sydney dentist Rodger Leighton gave girls nitrous oxide, then groped them: court
The girl remembered the dentist giving her nitrous oxide and saying something like "Do you feel nice?"
The patient, who is now an adult, is one of four women who will give evidence that former Sydney dentist Rodger Garry Leighton groped her after administering the sedative gas during dental treatment.
Dr Leighton, 79, has pleaded not guilty to six counts of indecent assault against the patients, who were under 16 at the time, at his surgery in Jannali, in Sydney's south, between 1973 and 1984.
On the first day of Dr Leighton's trial on Wednesday, Crown prosecutor Brad Hughes, SC, told the jury one of the alleged victims was in high school when she saw the dentist several times to get fillings.
"I will anticipate she will tell you ... the accused administered nitrous oxide via a mask being placed over her nose.
"The accused was talking to her, saying words similar to 'Do you feel nice?' and asking her 'Is that nice?' " Mr Hughes told the NSW District Court.
"She will allege the accused then fondled her breasts ... then started rubbing her vagina outside her underwear."
The woman is expected to give evidence that Dr Leighton did similar things when she saw him twice more to complete the treatment, the court heard.
"She will tell you that she did not tell anyone at the time about what the accused had done. She told her husband in about 2010 because she became anxious about her own daughter attending a dentist," Mr Hughes said.
He said two other women would give evidence that Dr Leighton rubbed their genitals after he administered the gas, and another woman remembers him fondling her breasts.
Dr Leighton allegedly assaulted the young girls for his own sexual gratification, Mr Hughes said.
A woman, who saw Dr Leighton between the age of seven and 12 to have baby teeth removed, told the court he gave her the gas before touching the outside of her genitals over her clothes.
He stared into her eyes and held her hand while touching her, she said.
"His face was looking into my eyes. He wasn't leaning on top of me but he was leaning so he could look into my eyes."
Defence barrister Andrew Miller told the jury Dr Leighton did not indecently assault the girls.
"It's not the accused's case that the complainants are lying. It's not the accused's case that they do not honestly believe what they allege happened to them happened.
"What is the case is that it didn't happen. They may well believe that's what happened to them, but it's a question of whether it did in fact happen."
Mr Miller urged the jury to pay close attention to expert evidence about the effects of nitrous oxide, and the difference between the way it was administered in the 1970s and 1980s compared to today.
He asked them also to listen to what the alleged victims say about the effects of the gas.
"[Listen to evidence] about what they thought it did to them, how it affected their abilities, how it made them feel, how it made them perceive the events that were occurring.
"Dr Leighton is innocent and is presumed innocent until or unless you find otherwise."
The trial continues before Judge Christopher Craigie.
(21/10/2015 Sydney Morning Herald)
話説回頭，摸骨教師應該判甚麼刑罰？這次他認罪，我想總刑期9個月已適合。畢竟非禮的形式很多，除了地鐡非禮定過判刑指引外，其他形式的，都不易訂立刑罰的指引。早兩日這一單:OL傾加薪千元遭攬胸 咸濕老闆非禮囚9周 :
已婚工程公司老闆王維國，去年涉與女文員商討薪酬加幅時，先後伺機攬她的腰及胸，王早前否認兩項非禮罪，今在荃灣法院被裁定一項罪成，判囚9星期。
控罪指，60歲被告王維國於去年10月23日，涉與女文員商討薪酬加幅時，先後伺機攬她腰及胸，又向女方求愛並邀她任其紅顏知己，但被拒絕。女方不甘受辱，個多月後離職並報警。
The girl remembered the dentist giving her nitrous oxide and saying something like "Do you feel nice?"
The patient, who is now an adult, is one of four women who will give evidence that former Sydney dentist Rodger Garry Leighton groped her after administering the sedative gas during dental treatment.
Dr Leighton, 79, has pleaded not guilty to six counts of indecent assault against the patients, who were under 16 at the time, at his surgery in Jannali, in Sydney's south, between 1973 and 1984.
On the first day of Dr Leighton's trial on Wednesday, Crown prosecutor Brad Hughes, SC, told the jury one of the alleged victims was in high school when she saw the dentist several times to get fillings.
"I will anticipate she will tell you ... the accused administered nitrous oxide via a mask being placed over her nose.
"The accused was talking to her, saying words similar to 'Do you feel nice?' and asking her 'Is that nice?' " Mr Hughes told the NSW District Court.
"She will allege the accused then fondled her breasts ... then started rubbing her vagina outside her underwear."
The woman is expected to give evidence that Dr Leighton did similar things when she saw him twice more to complete the treatment, the court heard.
"She will tell you that she did not tell anyone at the time about what the accused had done. She told her husband in about 2010 because she became anxious about her own daughter attending a dentist," Mr Hughes said.
He said two other women would give evidence that Dr Leighton rubbed their genitals after he administered the gas, and another woman remembers him fondling her breasts.
Dr Leighton allegedly assaulted the young girls for his own sexual gratification, Mr Hughes said.
A woman, who saw Dr Leighton between the age of seven and 12 to have baby teeth removed, told the court he gave her the gas before touching the outside of her genitals over her clothes.
He stared into her eyes and held her hand while touching her, she said.
"His face was looking into my eyes. He wasn't leaning on top of me but he was leaning so he could look into my eyes."
Defence barrister Andrew Miller told the jury Dr Leighton did not indecently assault the girls.
"It's not the accused's case that the complainants are lying. It's not the accused's case that they do not honestly believe what they allege happened to them happened.
"What is the case is that it didn't happen. They may well believe that's what happened to them, but it's a question of whether it did in fact happen."
Mr Miller urged the jury to pay close attention to expert evidence about the effects of nitrous oxide, and the difference between the way it was administered in the 1970s and 1980s compared to today.
He asked them also to listen to what the alleged victims say about the effects of the gas.
"[Listen to evidence] about what they thought it did to them, how it affected their abilities, how it made them feel, how it made them perceive the events that were occurring.
"Dr Leighton is innocent and is presumed innocent until or unless you find otherwise."
The trial continues before Judge Christopher Craigie.
(21/10/2015 Sydney Morning Herald)
話説回頭，摸骨教師應該判甚麼刑罰？這次他認罪，我想總刑期9個月已適合。畢竟非禮的形式很多，除了地鐡非禮定過判刑指引外，其他形式的，都不易訂立刑罰的指引。早兩日這一單:OL傾加薪千元遭攬胸 咸濕老闆非禮囚9周 :
已婚工程公司老闆王維國，去年涉與女文員商討薪酬加幅時，先後伺機攬她的腰及胸，王早前否認兩項非禮罪，今在荃灣法院被裁定一項罪成，判囚9星期。
控罪指，60歲被告王維國於去年10月23日，涉與女文員商討薪酬加幅時，先後伺機攬她腰及胸，又向女方求愛並邀她任其紅顏知己，但被拒絕。女方不甘受辱，個多月後離職並報警。
So do you mean 9 weeks or 9 months?
回覆刪除9 months for the teacher who indecently assaulted the 17-year-old. 9 weeks in the other case was dealt with two days ago.
刪除
回覆刪除客家中風警司家族採取卑鄙可恥惡毒的手段不單跟蹤、滋擾、刑毀，更利用黑社會、高利貸的無止盡地威脅騷擾，令我個人私隱被侵犯，心靈嚴重受創，心中只有一團怒氣，客家中風警司家族想阻嚇我追究下去, 跟蹤、滋擾、刑毀目的是令我每天疑神疑鬼，總覺得身邊的人都要逼害，開始以為是一些警員個人操守問題，最近才知道是客家中風警司家族想逼瘋我, 想逼瘋我患上被害妄想症，香港政府、截取通訊及監察事務專員、香港警務處和執法機關等有關單位不提已採取的緊急避險行為，造成我的損害的負有刑事責任。
//辯方求情指出，被告患妄想被迫害症多年，有精神病紀錄，曾到精神病院接受治療。//
回覆刪除呢啲嘢有關係咩？我唔明。
即係話呢條友都唔係想咁咸濕，但受精神病影響，不能自已囉。亦即係缺乏其他求情理由，炒啲雜碎囉。
刪除