各位情人節快樂!
標少今天開始偕老伴漂泊12天, 網絡不便, 暫且收筆。若有重大事情, 包括倒瀉屎及倒瀉籮蟹之類, 敬請留言相告, 尤其是有關上兩篇所述事情的發展。先行謝過。
我不認識何官或梁大狀, 風聞之事也沒披露, 批評他們純粹為捍衛法治而吭聲。坐得上神枱, 不一定要像一尊佛, 起碼有一定神氣而不是一股妖氣。為了客仔的福祉, 這樣簡單的一件案, 審了40天也未審結, 還經歷了兩次司法覆核及一次上訴, 比Mark Sutherland那宗非禮案更甚。本案是司法界及法律界的奇恥大辱。
我還是快快樂樂去浪漫好了。
旅行愉快!
回覆刪除謝謝。
回覆刪除原本審三天，而家審四十幾天仍未完結，並不合理。 客戶有冇方法追討損失?
回覆刪除https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=120046&currpage=T
回覆刪除只可用兩個字形容被告，奇葩
https://hk.news.appledaily.com/local/realtime/article/20190215/59264672
回覆刪除林官竟然有CJHC唔做
作生聞報紙 , 好耐無睇啦 !
回覆刪除https://www.bastillepost.com/hongkong/article/3973390-%E6%A2%81%E5%9C%8B%E9%9B%84%E8%A2%ABdq%E6%A1%88-%E4%B8%8A%E8%A8%B4%E5%BA%AD%E4%BB%8A%E6%9C%89%E8%A3%81%E6%B1%BA
回覆刪除長毛生...求仁得仁...從政生涯玩完...
潘官只是 JA, 是否應該先上 VP, 才再升上 Chief judge ?
回覆刪除In Loving Memory of Professor Michael Wilkinson
回覆刪除https://www.law.hku.hk/news/news-19-02-21.php
還記得每逢他上堂 (無論是conveyancing, probate, professional conduct or civil procedure) 必然全院滿坐，坐位和企位全滿，遲少少去，都不能進入課室。
刪除兔兔仔細讀過他寫的civil procedure .... frankly i wasnt too impressed.
刪除His enthusiasm in teaching conveyancing and civil procedure is worthy of remembrance. He nurtured so many lawyers and his departure is such a big loss to legal field.
刪除RIP.
Sam
Sorry to hear. He was still young. RIP.
刪除老大 可以返來咪啊 再唔係兔兔要掟西瓜啦
刪除阿兔哥, 我還在遊輪上, 你思念我? 我上網好貴喎。
刪除yes, big bro I miss u *sniff* come back soon.
刪除Simon Mayo 2月16日也仙遊了。以為有退休的senior judge 過世Judiciary 會發一篇短短的新聞稿悼念，但沒有。剛剛才知原來他做法官之前是solicitor，不知會不會是第一個solicitor 坐正高院/上訴庭？這裡有他的簡歷： https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200001/28/0128096.htm
刪除法 庭
回覆刪除Court :
第十四庭 十樓 No.14 (10/F)
裁判官
Magistrate :
何麗明暫委特委裁判官 Miss. HO Lai-ming, Deputy Special Magistrate
時間
Time
案件編號
Case No
被告/ 答辯人
Defendant/ Respondent
控罪/ 性質
Offences/ Nature
聆訊
Hearing
上午
10:30 am
ESS39884/2016
THAPA KAMALA THAPA KAMALA
行人疏忽
Pedestrian negligence
續審
Part Heard
what's wrong with this magistrate - 40 + days part heard? any recourse.... this seems certainly a vexatious magistrate.....
刪除Barrister Kelvin Leung (Leung Yiu Cheung)(梁耀祥大律師) is a moron. Being impolite to any magistrate (insane or not) is professional misconduct. He should be struck off the roll of barristers permanently.
刪除What do you think of Barrister Chan Ka Sing's misconduct conviction?
回覆刪除Barrister Chan Ka Sing Disciplined by the Barristers’ Disciplinary Tribunal - Comments?
https://www.hkba.org/content/barristers-disciplinary-tribunal
By Statement of Findings dated 24 January 2019, the Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal found two (2) complaints of misconduct against Mr Chan, Ka Sing to have been proved. By Order dated 24 January 2019 and Further Order dated 22 February 2019, the Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal ordered that Mr Chan be suspended from practice as a barrister for six weeks for Complaint 1 with effect from 29 January 2019, and be censured for Complaint 2.
I have no comment.
刪除標少, 番來有空可否講解下....
回覆刪除https://hk.news.appledaily.com/local/realtime/article/20190226/59304456
如果律政師敗訴, 咁當年share 陳生D相果位整macbook 仁兄咪可以上訴翻案?
不是如果, 律政司必然敗訴。但敗訴並不表示以往的定罪一定會逾時上訴成功, 因為以往有些定罪的基礎與協和小學案並不相同。
刪除那豈不是有一段時間裙底任影唔嬲？除非可以當他人遊蕩。
刪除當然最理想是訂定針對性的法例, 但在未立法之前, 也有間接的法例可採用。一直沒有立法是律政司的錯失。
刪除標少外遊回歸，可否寫一、兩篇遊記，分享一下您在旅遊期間的趣聞？
回覆刪除有空會寫。
刪除關於這宗案件有甚麼評論嗎？
回覆刪除https://topick.hket.com/article/2277773/
稱遭債主威脅傷害妻兒 東主圖劫銀行上訴得直無罪獲釋
判詞：
刪除https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=120240&currpage=T
沒有甚麼可以評論, 引導陪審團出問題, 重審囉。
刪除唔明點解上訴庭冇指示重審？
刪除