Criminals

大律師公會今天發聲明譴責昨日向高院及終院擲汽油彈的人。

Statement of the Hong Kong Bar Association condemning damage to the Court of Final Appeal and High Court Buildings 

The Hong Kong Bar Association deplores in the strongest possible terms the acts of arson and vandalism at the Court of Final Appeal and High Court buildings yesterday evening (8 December 2019). 

It is ironic that on a day that the International Human Rights Day (10 December 2019) was being commemorated, the very institution which administers justice, protects the rule of law as its key guardian, and upholds fundamental rights and freedoms, is being attacked. 

People who commit such acts are not genuine protestors but criminals. They must be brought to justice. Their acts cannot be defended or justified in any manner whatsoever, and were not committed in the exercise of any rights in a civilized society governed by the rule of law. 

As shown by the many thousands of people who participated in the march yesterday, views can be most powerfully conveyed through peaceful means. 

HONG KONG BAR ASSOCIATION 9 December 2019

半年以來, 大律師公會多次發出聲明, 我翻看每一篇, 今天才第一次看到用"criminals"來形容這些暴徒。直至今天, 公會也未曾呼籲過和平示威者與暴力割蓆, 因為公會骨子裏也不肯割蓆嗎? 投擲汽油彈是極嚴重罪行, 這些暴徒何以得逞, 就是因為受到掩護、默許和鼓勵, 所以這些人很少被拘捕, 也不退縮, 逃走時有人妨礙警察, 被捕時又有人搶犯。大律師公會有出過一句聲嗎?都是小罵大幫忙, 所以這個公會主事的人被政治立場沖昏了頭腦, 不肯呼籲市民與罪犯割蓆。拜託, 別跟我講jurisprudence, 罪行嚴重若此, 有良知的正常人都應該停下來想一想, 這種行為已超越合理抗爭的界限, 除非擺明車馬搞武裝革命, 為香港獨立而戰。

警察半年來施放了16000枚催淚彈, 但在大學撿獲超過一萬個汽油彈, 有沒有人統計過暴徒總共擲了幾多個汽油彈、 幾多塊磚? 如果你體諒暴徒擲汽油彈, 我又體諒警察過份用武, 但歸根究底違法就是違法, 體諒只是求情因素。當然, 刑事追究警察並不容易, 他們手執公權執行職務, 在過程中的失誤能否追究要視乎失誤程度, 在制服疑犯的過程中使用武力是否恰當要視乎整體環境, 沒有必然性的。以倫敦橋最近的恐襲為例, 兇徒已被途人制服在地上, 兇刀也被奪走了, 警察到場拉開制服兇徒的途人, 公然把兇徒射殺, 有人指責警察謀殺嗎? 都不是在讚揚警察行動果斷嗎? 我用這例子來說明這些事情是沒有硬道理的, 一切視乎整體環境來判斷, 要告警察不易過合理疑點這一關, 這些都不是旺角警署內強姦證人、警總非禮女醫生、七警暗巷毆打和朱經緯揮警棍打途人可比擬的。

五大訴求缺一不可, 解散警隊等廢話, 都是少講為妙, 講得多就像在唸毛語錄一樣的洗腦式麻醉, 連實際怎去執行都未想過。勇武不如用腦, 不動武就手癢難耐, 不去砸店舖就不爽快, 這都是精神出了問題。Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. 走筆至此, 又要找周公續夢了, 上一篇詛咒我的文宣五毛, 隨便繼續進來點擊發洩, clang of the prison gates之後便沒機會上網了。沒機會上網就不會妄想, 做回正常人。