2021年3月16日星期二

Aye Aye Sir

今天看到兩則有趣的新聞, 都來自澳洲的報章, 都談中澳關係的, 一則來自Sydney Morning Herald, 以此作為標題: 

‘Just not going to happen’: US warns China over Australian trade stoush

簡而言之:

The administration of President Joe Biden has told the Chinese government that “we are not going to leave Australia alone on the field”, according to the President’s Indo-Pacific co-ordinator, Kurt Campbell.

“We have made clear that the US is not prepared to improve relations in a bilateral and separate context at the same time that a close and dear ally is being subjected to a form of economic coercion,” he told The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age in the first interview a senior Biden official has given to any Australian media.

另一則來自Daily Mail, 以此作為標題: 


簡而言之:

Former foreign minister Julie Bishop has warned the Australian government to lay off 'tit-for-tat' with Beijing, saying the country could remain 'in the Chinese freezer' for years.

Ms Bishop said the government needed to ensure they don't offend our 'largest customer' while hosting an online panel for the Australian National University on Monday night.

Kurt Campbell曾被澳洲政府頒授勳章, 有投桃報李之嫌, 他太不理解中共了, 泱泱大國, 今時不同往日, 坐亞望冠, 勒緊衭頭都不會在脅逼下就犯, 聽到這種口脗, 再找個新項目來禁袋鼠產品入口, 看下你美國佬怎奈我何。

Julie Bishop就務實, 知道想賺錢就不應趕客的道理。 她這樣講:

'The way for the Australian government forward is to continue to protect our national interest, of course, but avoid the unnecessary media tit-for-tat with Chinese officials.'

連廢老標少在幾篇講中澳貿易的文, 都一直說要重視這種國家利益。「廢」字近日大熱, 甚麼「忠誠廢物」, 「廢柴學者」, 說得沸沸揚揚的。身為廢老的標少, 反正洗擦不掉污斑, 漂白也不脫漬, 所以直認不諱。畢竟崩口人忌崩口碗, 看到田教授這四字真言, 我都蒙混過去, 都不敢隨波逐流打秋風。可是, 上一篇有網友留言打開這話盒, 我也不忌諱乘機胡謅幾句。對於一眾忠心耿耿, 包括這裏時常山呼萬歲的網友, 一時之間被打成廢物, 打擊之大, 難以言表。我不禁想起John Milton的Paradise Lost, 廢物就像Satan, defeated and banished to hell。也不是要安慰大家, 不論忠誠或叛逆, 都一樣有廢物的, 物競天擇, 優劣分明, 除非不去比較篩選, 一比便知龍與鳳。哭吵甚麼? 平凡、平庸、愚蠢、愚昧, 不是一種罪啊。我都沒有罪惡感。人家嫌你不夠班, 你努力奮進囉, 或者你退位讓賢不要尸位素餐囉, 或者你扮深沉內斂不表態來藏拙囉, 像我對留言不表態一樣。哭哭啼啼, 可憐兮兮就自貶身價了。起碼都有褒義詞忠誠兩個字, 好過貪婪、投機、吃裏扒外。只要不去批評, 事事都Aye Aye Sir, 就不會把你打成漢奸了, 夫復何求? 

56 則留言:

  1. 忠誠廢物莫非講緊兔兔?

    唔講佢係香港搞革命搞成點先。

    之前實牙實齒侵侵會連任,結果宜家 China Joe 都做左兩個月總統了,喂,又話有軍隊既?

    難為侵侵要靠呢班人效忠。

    回覆刪除
  2. 標少哭哭吵吵又一篇

    回覆刪除
  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEq9eOBdn9o
    施永青, 一個新角度分析評論阿爺兩次插手處理香港事務(政制事務)
    當中提到, 民主進程有無倒退? 有. 但合情合理, 沒有違反基本法原則.
    BBTW

    回覆刪除
  4. 中國人的忠誠,只係要聽聽話話。唔好超越或挑戰主子。咁主子有幾聰明,其他人表現得咪有幾聰明囉!

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. //只係要聽聽話話。唔好超越或挑戰主子
      係咪講緊老尾呀?

      R

      刪除
    2. 老尾已放狠話要全世界都聽教聽話跟佢嗰套,不可超越,就算追近有些威脅都唔得,一定要搞残亞二,除了前蘇,連自己盟友都唔放過,先有日本、後有欧盟的例子。今次輪到中共這個青磚沙莉當老二,老尾大口侵用了全力都咬唔入且一口血,又睇吓拜老頭有乜板斧

      刪除
    3. Americans Don't Understand The Truth About China

      https://youtu.be/32UKBOJN0Eg


      Cyrus Janssen this guy is an international business consultant, entrepreneur, speaker and American expat., he has been living abroad since 2007, and now in Vancouver

      刪除
    4. typo:青磚沙梨
      4:56

      刪除
    5. 你老妈吖成日typo

      刪除
    6. //In Covert Regime Change, Lindsey A. O’Rourke shows us how states really act when trying to overthrow another state. She argues that conventional focus on overt cases misses the basic causes of regime change...

      Covert Regime Change assembles an original dataset of all American regime change operations during the Cold War. This fund of information shows the United States was ten times more likely to try covert rather than overt regime change during the Cold War. Her dataset allows O’Rourke to address three foundational questions: What motivates states to attempt foreign regime change? Why do states prefer to conduct these operations covertly rather than overtly? How successful are such missions in achieving their foreign policy goals?//

      Covert Regime Change
      Lindsey A. O’Rourke
      Cornell University Press

      https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501730658/covert-regime-change/

      *

      HOW CIA'S SECRET WAR ON SADDAM COLLAPSED

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1997/06/26/how-cias-secret-war-on-saddam-collapsed/b83592cb-0117-4c3c-a101-9550e29c94a3/

      *

      THE LOGIC FOR (SHODDY) U.S. COVERT ACTION IN SYRIA

      https://warontherocks.com/2016/07/the-logic-for-shoddy-u-s-covert-action-in-syria/

      ***

      企業家 Cyrus Janssen 都醒過 Seattle, 睇完FP的文章就知老尾又好做唔做, 自己國內問題都未掂又四處放火搞搞震

      America Will Only Win When China’s Regime Fails

      https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/11/america-chinas-regime-fails/

      刪除
    7. 疑似黃之鋒錄音流出(1:20mins)

      https://youtu.be/a-uDFxMf_Cs

      *

      錄音未經核實,看倌自己判斷真偽

      刪除
  5. 澳洲食少D,澳門人就無野食。。。

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 無事嘅澳門巳经开始鎮压啦!要好似缅甸咁!

      刪除
    2. 得幾百友出嚟行,好快行完就和平散水。澳得幾拾萬人,有成2千億多儲備,有排撐

      刪除
    3. 2千億比起子彈五毛一粒嘰嘰傻头傻腦

      刪除
  6. 激辯: 中國人式一命换一命遊戲
    Approval or Disapproval

    政府首鬆口拋打針誘因 接種疫苗可通關及放寬社交距離

    港府疫苗接種計劃問題多多,預約打針人數遠遜當局預期,外界過去連番要求政府提供誘因,包括容許已接種疫苗市民往返內地免隔離,惟政府遲遲不肯接納。行政長官林鄭月娥今早(17日)到立法會表示,考慮提供誘因吸引市民接種疫苗,包括通關、放寬社交措施;又指曾初步與有關的中央部門提出,如港人接種兩劑疫苗可否放寬入境內地的部分限制。

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 側聞加拿大想快快手, 送孟晚舟上飛機去美國,
      如此, 大小姐好可能面對長期監禁, 終死在獄中.

      如何救人? 一命换一命?????
      我以為講呢樣

      刪除
    2. 我反對! 我為何要踏著屍體只為返大陸按摩?

      刪除
    3. 加方收到中方通知 斯派佛康明凱將於周五及下周一受審中國電訊企業華為太子女孟晚舟2018年12月在加拿大被扣留後不久,加國前外交官康明凱與商人斯派佛先後在中國被扣留;二人因涉嫌為境外刺探國家秘密,去年6月被提起公訴。加拿大政府周三(17日)證實,收到中方通知康明凱和斯派佛在未來幾日接受一審的確實日期。

      刪除
    4. 双方已播下戰爭的種子,好!

      刪除
    5. 剛看到消息,拘捕太子女嘅加拿大警官已經辭職,拒絕出庭,並到澳門賭場工作,以抗議拘捕命令不合法

      刪除
    6. 上錯贼船,失业大军澳门又多个

      刪除
    7. TO, 有關閣下之消息, 上年11月19日南早(SCMP, Reporter:Ian Young)已報導, "former Canadian police officer Ben Chang, who communicated with FBI after Huawei executive’s arrest",去了澳門

      刪除
    8. Canadian police officer 驚被cia追殺, 被美國/加拿大政府控告叛國?
      因為出庭會被盤問, 問出不利老尾的證供、甚至內幕.

      R

      刪除
  7. 俾老板當住全世界人問候,D忠誠廢物唔知有咩感覺,希望他們睇開D啦

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 誰是他下一目標?再下一城?

      刪除
    2. 關心一吓你地美爹sleepy Joe好過,佢自上任以來,仍未曾公開見傳媒接受即場提問咁奇怪,你地唔驚失去靠山?

      刪除
    3. 田飛龍不是誰的老板啦, 1133你不用嗨

      博主也不是被客仔罵個狗血淋頭嗎? 可以睇開的

      刪除
    4. 想改寫做狗咬狗骨,有難度囉D忠誠廢物

      刪除
    5. 。。。俾大佬公開吊吊完再撕,任插任玩咁仲唔夠忠诚呀大佬?嘰嘰嘰

      刪除
  8. Kailim Chung
    説到底,香港只不過是中國的一個城市,一國两制的特區待遇只不過是歷史原因造成。若果安分守己,用心處理香港作為一個城市的市政事務,不提升、甚至自動捲入至國際政制鬥爭層面,相信不會再出大問題。最重要的是,去年中央出手之後,泛民完全没有還手之力,美國又有心無力,再次反中共只會再次禍及黎民。不要忘記,我們父輩祖輩六、七十年前逃離大陸,是逃避没完没了的意識形態政治鬥爭及社會動亂,今天我們不應該破壞安寜社會,去搞鷄犬不寜的政治運動。

    回覆刪除
  9. 。。。會議氣氛沉悶


    傳中方藉阿拉斯加會晤 要求美方撤回前朝對華限制
    美國國務卿布林肯及國家安全顧問沙利文將於周四(18日),在阿拉斯加與中國中央外事辦主任楊潔篪及國務委員兼外長王毅會晤。美媒報道,有消息指北京計劃藉這次面對面會談,要求華府撤銷前總統特朗普任內多項對中國設限的措施。

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. Alex MA
      1) 美國先拉攏日本,再拉攏印度,之後拉攏澳洲、韓國,試圖從東北到東南兜截中國。
      2) 中國同美國的第三層官員在美國本土之外地點見面、開會,是從中國副總理劉鶴到美國與美國政府會商兩國關稅的層級再往下跌了一層,而且要美國官員走出本土之外,是有一種往下看的姿態。
      3) 美國從1950年就對中華人民共和國進行攻擊、封鎖、詆譭、破壞,無所不用其極,而中國就是繼續發展、進步、繁榮、強大到今天的勢態,中國完全不需要看美國的臉色了。

      中美摸底 新起點「探路」
      https://std.stheadline.com/daily/article/2342433/%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1-%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B-%E4%B8%AD%E7%BE%8E%E6%91%B8%E5%BA%95-%E6%96%B0%E8%B5%B7%E9%BB%9E-%E6%8E%A2%E8%B7%AF

      中國人民大學國際關係學院副教授左希迎對筆者表示,在當下中美關係語境中,有三個具體議題將觸發雙邊交鋒與討論:一是人權問題,尤其圍繞涉港涉疆,雙方將進行激烈交鋒;二是中美經貿與高科技問題;三是合作抗疫,特別是關乎疫苗的分配和認證問題。

      孫興傑表示,中國需要主動塑造中美關係,以利於自身。他將國家分成兩類:國際體系內國家、體系性國家。他認為中國清楚將自身定位為前者,而美國則是後者。雖然中國在國際經濟體系中的地位不斷上升,但立足於國際經濟體系之中,反對與美國「脫鈎」。

      中國勢將採取多種靈活策略應對美國,既與美國談判,亦堅持自身原則。日前落幕的全國兩會上,中國通過外長記者會等方式,釋出了對於中美關係的穩定策略:一方面,涉及中國國家底線及核心利益的絕不讓步,尤其是台灣問題;另一方面,願與美國在公平公正基礎上良性競爭,探尋可合作空間。值得一提的是,在去年多重衝擊的背景下,中美兩國的貿易規模仍然達到四點一萬億元人民幣,增長百分之八點八。 

      刪除
  10. Australian Associated Press May 2020:

    "Former foreign minister Julie Bishop has copped an extraordinary spray from an ex-colleague after urging calm and considered diplomacy with China. Liberal senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, who was a junior minister to Ms Bishop, launched a scathing attack. Another air-head comment from the 'couch'. We had six years of 'Instagram diplomacy' that ignored CCP skulduggery and 'debt trap diplomacy'," she tweeted.Senator Fierravanti-Wells is demanding Australia be paid "reparations" from China over coronavirus."It is incumbent on the government to investigate all possible ways to recover damages for health costs and damage to our economy," she told parliament.The former Pacific and international development minister urged Australia to diversify trade relationships and decrease reliance on China."I am concerned that the CCP is taking advantage of the pandemic to further its insidious debt-trap diplomacy by taking advantage of economically stressed nation-states through the Belt and Road Initiative," she said.

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 〃Understanding ‘Beijing expansionism’
      By Gregory Clark
      Nov 26, 2020

      Canberra’s shift to anti-China rhetoric and expanded military spending is said to be due to China’s shift to expansionist and aggressive policies. And just in case there is some truth in the ‘Beijing expansionism’ claim let’s look at the claimed evidence...

      *

      5 Hongkong.

      No argument, unless you think governments should tolerate severe damage to urban facilities in the territories they own and have temporarily entrusted to others.

      I share some of the concern over Beijing’s recent return to the more authoritarian policies of the past. But some of the anti-Beijing criticisms we see now from the US, and Australia, go too far.

      A February 2019 edition of the New York Times front-paged the Chinese characters for guize. Anyone who knew Chinese could tell you they simply mean rules or regulations.

      The Times told us they represented China’s goal of world domination.

      Even trivial things can cause misunderstanding. Much is made of Beijing’s criticism of Australia for urging an enquiry into China’s responsibility for the covid virus.

      In fact China has no objection. It was objecting to way the demand was made – as an immediate repeat of a similar but aggressive Trump demand.

      Most of the criticisms of Beijing are from people who do not speak Chinese or know China. To those who do know China I say cool it. We have seen much more fire and bluster from China in the past.

      China is probably the only nation in the world with a saying ‘the good person does not become a soldier.’ That is why it was so easy in the past for the more militaristic peoples in the West and Japan to invade and steal territory from China.

      If it is determined not to let that happen again.

      Australia with its backing for the Quad concept – the four-legged military grouping of Japan, the US, India and Australia – seems more eager than most to want to provoke Beijing.

      Few seem to want to mention it today but the original idea of the Quad was launched in the late sixties by ANU hawks. It was to act as a barrier to China’s then alleged expansionism into Asia via the Vietnam War. The anti-Saigon Vietnamese were supposed to be Chinese puppets.

      Today the Quad is supposed to block China’s expansionism in general.

      But the Indian leg looks wobbly. New Delhi has refused to join RECP, the 15 nation economic grouping designed to bring much of Asia into an ambitious economic bloc.

      Without India, the grouping will almost certainly come to be dominated by China. Tokyo’s distress at the prospect is palpable.

      But maybe a RECP-style Asian economic bloc is the answer. Even if it is China dominated that will simply be a recognition of the economic inevitable. And as such maybe it will help put an end to anti-China ambitions of the arms sellers and hawk commentators.〃

      https://johnmenadue.com/understanding-beijing-expansionism/

      刪除
    2. Gregory Clark began his career in Australia’s Department of External Affairs, with postings to Hong Kong and Moscow. Resigning in 1964 to protest at Australia’s participation in the Vietnam War he moved to Japan, becoming emeritus president of Tama University in Tokyo and vice-president of the pioneering Akita International University. He continues to live in Japan and has established himself as a commentator/academic. Between 1969-74 he was correspondent for The Australian in Tokyo.
      More on www.gregoryclark.net

      刪除
  11. 杜拜也搶香港人
    https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/7383031
    一夫多妻:P, 港人肯走未!?

    4個老婆#yup# #yup# #yup#

    男人至上主義,一夫多妻制, 好似幾好咁!

    杜拜人唔食豬肉,啱晒港豬移民:P

    似乎好多人唔記得馬來西亞其實都係回教國家,華人咪又係咁生存!
    招咁多外國人,政府自然有共存辦法!

    Hi,到到都要香港人, 係得香港政府成日叫人走, 真奇怪!

    所以港人走左, 真係不用可惜!

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 【杜拜也搶香港人 零稅率和准雙重國籍】
      「夜遊杜拜」適合你嗎?
      // 香港泛起新一浪移民潮,就連中東酋長也加入「搶人」。阿聯酋最大城市杜拜政府近日在Facebook刊登付費廣告,用繁體中文邀請香港人移居當地,還列出零稅率、雙重國籍、三代落戶、福利優渥、護照強大等諸多好處,顯得誠意十足。其背景是阿聯酋今年1月修改《國籍法》,容許外國人才入籍,成為首個開放移民的阿拉伯伊斯蘭國家,為過渡到「後石油時代」做好準備//
      詳細報道:http://bit.ly/38RfKQg

      呢個要認真考慮嗎?
      網上有港人指出以前佢既香港朋友去杜拜做打工,三倍香港人工,包住,最後長睡於他鄉!

      有無得食燒腩仔飲紅酒先?

      刪除
    2. 迪拜可以吃豬肉和喝酒的,阿聯酋的中餐館都有豬肉供應。

      刪除
  12. 西方很虚弱了。。。

    藍韜文:英不重回冷戰思維 尋求與華經濟合作
    英國外相藍韜文周三(17日)向美國阿斯彭安全論壇(US Aspen Security Forum)發表視像講話,警告民主面臨冷戰結束以來最大威脅,未來10年專制政體的總財富會超越民主政體。他談及中國威脅時指,相信世界不會重回冷戰思維,中國亦不會消失,英國會在商貿領域尋求與華合作。


    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 西方已經打定輸數,講完。

      刪除
  13. 開審前認罪都算醒目

    涉暴動設計師開審前認罪還押候判  (14:21)
    https://news.mingpao.com/ins/%e6%b8%af%e8%81%9e/article/20210318/s00001/1616047028197/%e6%b6%89%e6%9a%b4%e5%8b%95%e8%a8%ad%e8%a8%88%e5%b8%ab%e9%96%8b%e5%af%a9%e5%89%8d%e8%aa%8d%e7%bd%aa%e9%82%84%e6%8a%bc%e5%80%99%e5%88%a4

    Peter Lee
    做咗壞事,在法律面前扮死狗,又要威,又戴埋鋼盔,當然是有計劃亂港,判刑應該重一D,以有阻嚇作用.

    董禮霖
    認罪判輕好多

    Victor Fok
    轉死性?

    回覆刪除
  14. 地盤工煽惑他人包圍新屋嶺判160小時社服令 律政司覆核改囚13月
    https://news.mingpao.com/ins/%e6%b8%af%e8%81%9e/article/20210318/s00001/1616052031996/%e5%9c%b0%e7%9b%a4%e5%b7%a5%e7%85%bd%e6%83%91%e4%bb%96%e4%ba%ba%e5%8c%85%e5%9c%8d%e6%96%b0%e5%b1%8b%e5%b6%ba%e5%88%a4160%e5%b0%8f%e6%99%82%e7%a4%be%e6%9c%8d%e4%bb%a4-%e5%be%8b%e6%94%bf%e5%8f%b8%e8%a6%86%e6%a0%b8%e6%94%b9%e5%9b%9a13%e6%9c%88

    Victor Fok
    裁判官黃雅茵真的是黃的無改錯姓

    董禮霖
    抵死,邪惡的大話精。

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 點解咁多裁判官犯原則性錯誤?其實佢地識唔識乜嘢係原則?

      刪除
  15. What you wrote could amount to contempt of Court.

    回覆刪除
  16. "壹傳媒創辦人黎智英、民主黨創黨主席李柱銘等7人,被控前年8月18日組織維園流水式集會,案件今(17日)續在西九龍裁判法院作結案陳辭。辯方形容警方當日沒協助群眾離開,甚至撤走軍裝警員,民陣自然承擔疏散群眾的責任,而民陣除了透過被告帶領群眾離場,已沒其他更有效的方法。
    代表李柱銘和何俊仁的大律師布穎琪表示,警方從未有向民陣表明,手持橫額步離維園的人正觸犯法例,質疑警方當日不插手,等同容許群眾透過遊行的方式疏散。布穎琪批評警方沒履行職責,離有需要的市民而去,情況有如名曲《Just When I Needed You Most》般「You left me just when I needed you most」,事後拘捕被告的做法屬「秋後算帳」。
    代表梁國雄的資深大律師潘熙則表示,控方沒任何證據證明梁國雄有份組織遊行,形容他只是應民陣呼籲,與其他民主派議員和富影響力的人身處隊頭,以及帶領群眾離開。"

    一出事就鬥快割蓆,不斷將責任推落民陣度..."不切割"?呢套外國紀錄片真係夠晒颯刺...XD

    回覆刪除
  17. 勸大家睇下末日列車呢套電影

    查實呢次運動 … 係咪已經失敗咗啦 ╮(╯-╰)╭
    https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/7382316
    史上最傻的嗎最失敗既抗爭[sosad]
    未開波就話自己贏5比0[sosad]
    跟住日日整日程表送頭,報名坐監[sosad]
    之後就食黃店抗爭,班老千靠賣價高質低既垃圾發達[sosad]
    之後就國際線,資助攬鈔巴係外國買樓買車,眾志仔怒Hi牙侵,支持拜登[sosad]
    之後就話過左國安法=贏左、攬抄成功、破局、加速師......結局就係個個走佬移民,走住黎Hi[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]

    烏合之眾[sosad]

    贏左啦, 有得移民!

    出盡力求救 點知國際當你傻的嗎

    而家幾比幾呀
    點睇都係藍色領先緊喎

    中國人做什麼事情都沒有耐心,不講考究,做的所有事情都是虎頭蛇尾。而且中國人最大的毛病就是一個不團結的國度和民族,就是一盤散沙。從古至今內戰不斷。
    原文網址:https://kknews.cc/world/vvk9b5y.html

    回覆刪除
  18. https://www.farwestchina.com/ farwestchina是一個在新疆住了十幾年的西方人辦的新疆旅遊網站,根據該網站信息,外國人可以像去中國其它地區一樣自由到新疆旅遊。 CNN近期炮製了一則拒絕兒童與外國父母團聚的故事,但記者可以在喀什自由採訪,自由進入故事主角家裡,已經說明了一切,無論CNN這麼剪切加濾鏡都沒有意義。
    https://thegrayzone.com/2021/03/17/report-uyghur-genocide-sham-university-neocon-punish-china/ 美國獨立新聞調查網站揭露西方主流媒體炒作的新疆屠殺報告來自一家野雞大學,但 英國衛報報導時卻說來自可信的機構。 還有明報日前報導有港商的工廠無辜被列入強迫勞動名單,哎曬救命想邀請西人來檢查工廠證明清白,西人都不理睬。 可見西方政客、媒體、“人權組織”有多麼無恥,毫無良知。 標少贊成澳洲處理中國關係要以澳洲經濟利益優先,也就是他不知道正是炒作這些“人權問題”的澳洲政客喪失人類基本良知,放棄文明社會的核心價值。 睇怕標少是患了斯德哥爾摩綜合徵。

    回覆刪除
  19. 李柱銘資深大律師係已被定罪罪犯!Barrister Martin Lee SC declared a Convicted Criminal - do you think he will be struck off the Roll of Barristers? -
    https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=134671&currpage=T

    回覆刪除
  20. Barrister Gary CC Lam (林展程大律師) of DVC either misled Judge Liu on purpose, or he was so flagrantly incompetent his application was "riddled with grave errors and egregious abuse" by reason of his own flagrant incompetence - do you think he will be disciplined by the Hong Kong Bar Association? - https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=134766&currpage=T

    回覆刪除