tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post6671650367398347945..comments2024-03-29T04:41:33.150+11:00Comments on 標少札記: 公關為法官塗脂抹粉?標少http://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-17511189838659292022018-03-11T04:31:13.373+11:002018-03-11T04:31:13.373+11:00香港唔係行使無罪推定原則、寧縱無枉嘅咩?香港唔係行使無罪推定原則、寧縱無枉嘅咩?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-26748390851075458572018-03-11T04:14:49.783+11:002018-03-11T04:14:49.783+11:00如果2018年3月9日下午9:06匿名說的是現實,豈不是真的「官字兩個口」?被告人真的要賭彩數,看看...如果2018年3月9日下午9:06匿名說的是現實,豈不是真的「官字兩個口」?被告人真的要賭彩數,看看遇到甚麼官!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-67766835949439559132018-03-10T12:25:13.497+11:002018-03-10T12:25:13.497+11:00無辦法,依家社會越來越小學雞化...
有咁既讀者,就有咁既論點...無辦法,依家社會越來越小學雞化...<br />有咁既讀者,就有咁既論點...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-59352733388358095832018-03-10T10:51:28.923+11:002018-03-10T10:51:28.923+11:00“were taken into the court on different days by th...“were taken into the court on different days by the public relations firm or consultant。。。。。 ” taken into the curt... apparently Chan became convinced the celebrities came to his curt room in support of donald on the lobbying persuasion on part of the PR firm. thats how i read and understand it. <br /><br />personally i believe Chan is delusional ... <br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18313952541462768401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-40322257072785183592018-03-09T23:11:54.646+11:002018-03-09T23:11:54.646+11:009:40, 判詞的連結在《曾蔭權案的陪審員有受到污染嗎?》9:40, 判詞的連結在《曾蔭權案的陪審員有受到污染嗎?》標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-13776365076926183742018-03-09T22:11:21.595+11:002018-03-09T22:11:21.595+11:00主觀vs客觀!個point係在裁判法院審時,大部分官都係为求快用主觀判,費時用腦,釘錯又如何?這是我...主觀vs客觀!個point係在裁判法院審時,大部分官都係为求快用主觀判,費時用腦,釘錯又如何?這是我主塲!DannyChenghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02896743475351740634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-79381668656476859692018-03-09T21:53:19.745+11:002018-03-09T21:53:19.745+11:00唔係兒嬉, 只不過是presentation姐~
唔係你想上訴判詞再複雜生澀些?唔係兒嬉, 只不過是presentation姐~<br />唔係你想上訴判詞再複雜生澀些?BBTWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-39302013147844042472018-03-09T21:40:10.264+11:002018-03-09T21:40:10.264+11:00請問邊度有得睇判詞?請問邊度有得睇判詞?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-9999054155002335112018-03-09T21:34:45.814+11:002018-03-09T21:34:45.814+11:00真係幾兒嬉。真係幾兒嬉。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-91813158569937460602018-03-09T21:06:54.667+11:002018-03-09T21:06:54.667+11:00個法官想放時,就會說是過失。
想釘時,就會說是專業裁判官,不需事事提醒,從判詞中,已看到裁判官在實質...個法官想放時,就會說是過失。<br />想釘時,就會說是專業裁判官,不需事事提醒,從判詞中,已看到裁判官在實質上已小心考慮各証人,包括上訴人的証言。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-6684396333473317152018-03-09T20:16:32.953+11:002018-03-09T20:16:32.953+11:00http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20180309/mobile/bk...http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20180309/mobile/bkn-20180309161101966-0309_00822_001.html<br /><br />法官表示,本案2被告在受審時沒有案底,並在受審時有作供自辯。原審裁判官在裁斷他們的證供是否可信時,有需要根據案例,像提醒陪審團般提醒自己,他們屬品格良好人士,其證供可信性較有案底人士高。不過裁判官沒有這樣做,這屬關鍵性遺漏,是法律上犯錯。<br />-----------<br />標少,如果當初法官下判詞時有講「本官有提醒自己被告屬品格良好的人士…」,係咪就無問題?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-82787409239846413072018-03-09T20:11:19.674+11:002018-03-09T20:11:19.674+11:00在席親友對[裁判官]判刑有影響, 是眾所週知的, 都唔講潛意識.在席親友對[裁判官]判刑有影響, 是眾所週知的, 都唔講潛意識.BBTWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-65757009364387242762018-03-09T19:30:03.680+11:002018-03-09T19:30:03.680+11:00講到潛意識呢家野,燈光柔和度,各人衣著色系,現場氣溫,擺設,空間感,去法庭時沿途景觀,有無塞車,等等...講到潛意識呢家野,燈光柔和度,各人衣著色系,現場氣溫,擺設,空間感,去法庭時沿途景觀,有無塞車,等等,都可以對潛意識造成影響.學界對呢d環境因素同潛意識之間既關係有唔少研究,相信大家都聽過下.在席親友對陪審員潛意識有無影響?呢個我反而未聽個!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-26087020007943188192018-03-09T17:33:10.563+11:002018-03-09T17:33:10.563+11:00Mr Bunny, you need an eye examination or brain sca...Mr Bunny, you need an eye examination or brain scan. The paragraph you cited only said what Andrew Chan observed, namely, these bunch of people were taken into court and seated by the PR people. How did Andrew Chan wrong them? Whether these people were phoned and requested to go to court to "flex their muscle" or they go there on their own volition was never commented by Chan J. "Taken into" means they were taken to the exclusive area reserved for the defendant's family and friend and seated. 標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-87773168117001510522018-03-09T16:39:30.577+11:002018-03-09T16:39:30.577+11:00當有人話建制鼓勵人們侮辱法官,呢D泛民媒體又何嘗不是做緊同一個行為。。。
當有人話建制鼓勵人們侮辱法官,呢D泛民媒體又何嘗不是做緊同一個行為。。。<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-13807066561571293552018-03-09T14:33:35.707+11:002018-03-09T14:33:35.707+11:00"40. The Defendant in this case, knowing that..."40. The Defendant in this case, knowing that good character evidence cannot be introduced from witnesses testifying for the prosecution, had decided to introduce such evidence through the back door. There was of course no direct evidence suggesting the public relations firm or consultant had been engaged by the Defendant himself, the inference however was overwhelming and it would be an affront to common sense to conclude that there was not some consent, acquiescence or involvement by the Defendant."<br /><br />看完上文下理, 我認為陳官從觀察看到有pr 嘅人參與帶名人入座留位..., 但冇直接證據這些pr 人是被告請的, 話雖如此, 他認為如得不到被告同意這些pr人參與, 是有違常理<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-78344815608611568162018-03-09T11:45:29.960+11:002018-03-09T11:45:29.960+11:0039. Prior to both the first and second trials, th...39. Prior to both the first and second trials, the Defendant through his solicitors sought approval from the court to reserve exclusive seats for his family and friends. His request was acceded to by the court. Throughout the second trial, especially towards the end, former colleagues of the Defendant, for example, his former Financial Secretary and former Secretary for Justice, past Legislative Councillors from the Democratic Party, present Legislative Councillors from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong and prominent religious figures, were taken into the court on different days by the public relations firm or consultant sitting at the exclusive area, similar to Mr To Kit’s situation. The objective was undoubtedly to inform and impress upon the jury that the Defendant was a good person and had support from people across the whole spectrum of the society.<br /><br />40. The Defendant in this case, knowing that good character evidence cannot be introduced from witnesses testifying for the prosecution, had decided to introduce such evidence through the back door. There was of course no direct evidence suggesting the public relations firm or consultant had been engaged by the Defendant himself, the inference however was overwhelming and it would be an affront to common sense to conclude that there was not some consent, acquiescence or involvement by the Defendant. Had the engagement of public relations firm or consultant been brought to my attention earlier, I might consider discharging the entire jury.<br /><br />其實這兩段對我來說比較難明陳官想說什麼的。第39段:” the objective was undoubtedly to”. 陳官一方面沒有說名人係PR firm 事先安排及邀請(PR firm嘅計劃,但用了objective 及undoubtedly 字。咁係是說各人出庭, 即使係自發出庭,唧目的是inform and impress ... 嗎?如自發出庭, 我咁睇,陳官點解要對這方面有意見。另一方面,如陳官假設各人係pr firm 事先計劃安排下出庭, 咁説the objective was undoubtedly to ... 亦可以, 但最好先說這是一個假設。<br /><br />TerryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-89668873673620950162018-03-09T11:22:15.199+11:002018-03-09T11:22:15.199+11:00“Throughout the second trial, especially towards t...“Throughout the second trial, especially towards the end, former colleagues of the Defendant, for example, his former Financial Secretary and former Secretary for Justice, past Legislative Councillors from the Democratic Party, present Legislative Councillors from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong and prominent religious figures, were taken into the court on different days by the public relations firm or consultant sitting at the exclusive area, similar to Mr To Kit’s situation.”<br /><br /><br />roll eyes....老大。。。。。自己讀啦 <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18313952541462768401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-83169030783662546132018-03-09T10:06:19.533+11:002018-03-09T10:06:19.533+11:00In that case you have made grave error. A lawyer s...In that case you have made grave error. A lawyer should read the original text before entering into the arena. No where did Andrew Chan say these bunch of people went to court on their own volition or otherwise. You have made yourself a clown. It is time for you to throw in the towel.標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-15773222528408932742018-03-09T09:58:05.408+11:002018-03-09T09:58:05.408+11:00兔兔沒看過啊 但有關係嘛 words from Chan project this image ...兔兔沒看過啊 但有關係嘛 words from Chan project this image he was falsely accusing 黃和薯片 without any evidence. in the process Chan made himself look like the laughable CLOWN he has always been. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18313952541462768401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-10647922474829757832018-03-09T08:57:23.620+11:002018-03-09T08:57:23.620+11:00你又病發了, 我會體諒的, 怎會生你氣, 生豬生狗的氣也不會生病兔的氣, 別擔心。你又病發了, 我會體諒的, 怎會生你氣, 生豬生狗的氣也不會生病兔的氣, 別擔心。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-82281611628478381712018-03-09T08:54:12.751+11:002018-03-09T08:54:12.751+11:00我以為免仔英咁好不會犯這低級錯誤, 原來不外如此。你實際上有看過判詞的嗎? 找出判詞中那一句說這些人...我以為免仔英咁好不會犯這低級錯誤, 原來不外如此。你實際上有看過判詞的嗎? 找出判詞中那一句說這些人自發不自發到庭給我看。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-63774091454731604762018-03-09T02:54:45.777+11:002018-03-09T02:54:45.777+11:00兔兔見到老大 歇斯底里 死皮賴活 地要為個可笑卑賤的港共kangaroo curt 塗脂抹粉得爭取點...兔兔見到老大 歇斯底里 死皮賴活 地要為個可笑卑賤的港共kangaroo curt 塗脂抹粉得爭取點尊嚴 diginity 不禁莞爾<br /><br />不好 老大生氣了 兔兔下了 Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18313952541462768401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-29815333226168200852018-03-09T02:47:11.495+11:002018-03-09T02:47:11.495+11:00陳慶偉連facts 都 misapprehend 錯 薯片和黃都是自發去支持都 陳真是頭給支...陳慶偉連facts 都 misapprehend 錯 薯片和黃都是自發去支持都 陳真是頭給支那共產黨丟臉的狗啊 什麽垃圾狗屎都昇。。。。。。Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18313952541462768401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-36913500314819175962018-03-09T02:20:10.270+11:002018-03-09T02:20:10.270+11:00https://www.gov.uk/guidance/judicial-assistants-in...https://www.gov.uk/guidance/judicial-assistants-in-the-court-of-appeal-civil-division<br /><br />Judicial assistants. 工作包括review draft judgement 都得啩。<br /><br />TerryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com