tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post5420607809998297478..comments2024-03-29T04:41:33.150+11:00Comments on 標少札記: 店鋪盜竊標少http://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comBlogger45125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-38515862647014212422022-11-18T17:01:29.508+11:002022-11-18T17:01:29.508+11:00我也是柴灣官小畢業 我許我們是同學我也是柴灣官小畢業 我許我們是同學Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-47920073755467829142017-05-08T16:58:44.777+10:002017-05-08T16:58:44.777+10:00已發送了已發送了Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-78370564725274552932017-05-08T16:53:24.527+10:002017-05-08T16:53:24.527+10:00billlcsiu@gmail.combilllcsiu@gmail.com標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-65898514948790730602017-05-08T16:51:00.632+10:002017-05-08T16:51:00.632+10:00Sorry....可否比你電郵給我,我唔識搵!Sorry....可否比你電郵給我,我唔識搵!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-32473188950897233832017-05-08T16:41:05.782+10:002017-05-08T16:41:05.782+10:00私下發電郵給我吧, 我不想公開討論個別案情。私下發電郵給我吧, 我不想公開討論個別案情。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-52800277190017898632017-05-08T16:34:52.290+10:002017-05-08T16:34:52.290+10:00你好我在5月7號在超市盜竊,去了差館落口供,要比500元保釋金,5月21號再去簽到。 ...你好我在5月7號在超市盜竊,去了差館落口供,要比500元保釋金,5月21號再去簽到。 問題一:他們會否上去我屋企搜證<br />問題二:因我偷了244元,大約11件東西,可否上庭自行簽保呢? 本人不想留案底,我是初犯者深感後悔<br />煩請解答我問題,謝謝<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-9162860787842220362016-04-30T22:27:11.848+10:002016-04-30T22:27:11.848+10:00Bernacchi Bernacchi 標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-35945180015578538002016-04-30T21:56:36.856+10:002016-04-30T21:56:36.856+10:00按證據而言我有甚麼? 我只有上訴判辭。被告第一次定罪由A.M. Niamatullah代表他, 上訴...按證據而言我有甚麼? 我只有上訴判辭。被告第一次定罪由A.M. Niamatullah代表他, 上訴得直因為原審法官引導陪審團出問題。重審被告再被定罪, 第二次上訴由貝納奇(Bernachi)QC帶着新丁湯家驊代表他, 維持原判。當時的貝納奇應該是排頭位的最資深大律師, 我還是中學生。如果講律師的能力, 肯定被告在這方面沒有吃虧。這件案有對被告頗不利的科學鑒證, 也有對被告有利的證據, 都擺在陪審團面前, 他們把他定罪, 上訴庭又審視過, 我還有胡亂講的空間嗎? 不如你自己看判辭。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-89288662691250598382016-04-30T21:00:04.570+10:002016-04-30T21:00:04.570+10:00按證據而言按證據而言Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-52127967217241772162016-04-30T12:13:40.486+10:002016-04-30T12:13:40.486+10:00我不是做占卜的。我不是做占卜的。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-18123344060180476352016-04-29T18:19:54.601+10:002016-04-29T18:19:54.601+10:00 歐陽炳強,是否無辜?
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/ar... 歐陽炳強,是否無辜?<br /><br />http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20150801/19239459<br /><br />http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20020915/2832183Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-14338950357824488812016-04-28T20:09:53.345+10:002016-04-28T20:09:53.345+10:00Thanks. I will tonight.Thanks. I will tonight.標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-33958969314610031792016-04-28T18:15:12.370+10:002016-04-28T18:15:12.370+10:00This is a more detailed one
http://www.bbc.com/ne...This is a more detailed one<br /><br />http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-36081358Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-23223698945822586572016-04-28T15:06:59.250+10:002016-04-28T15:06:59.250+10:00印象中你提過小時候住柴灣念柴灣官小?你比我幸運,我念的是天台學校。個波踢左出操場要跑七層樓梯哦PC印象中你提過小時候住柴灣念柴灣官小?你比我幸運,我念的是天台學校。個波踢左出操場要跑七層樓梯哦PCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-33017538411294280302016-04-28T14:53:32.369+10:002016-04-28T14:53:32.369+10:00Some more info, probably a bit long to read:
http...Some more info, probably a bit long to read:<br /><br />http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-20782891<br />http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-35462767Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-26824562376456984742016-04-28T14:44:16.833+10:002016-04-28T14:44:16.833+10:00If so, then there will be perverting course of jus...If so, then there will be perverting course of justice and manslaughter (involuntary) charges.標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-43823433656831047272016-04-28T14:41:18.256+10:002016-04-28T14:41:18.256+10:00525章不適用於兩地, 而且引渡條例是503章, 也不適用。525章不適用於兩地, 而且引渡條例是503章, 也不適用。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-29148494012542235592016-04-28T13:59:28.294+10:002016-04-28T13:59:28.294+10:00Seems There will be serious consequence in the Hil...Seems There will be serious consequence in the Hillsborough disaster, with verified evidence of lies, systematic rewrite of statements, etc<br /><br />The ex-chief superintendent could face criminal chargesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-53568242807601120382016-04-28T09:41:40.837+10:002016-04-28T09:41:40.837+10:00謝謝標少分享,另外我找到
==
香港法例 第525章 刑事事宜相互法律协助条例 第5条 拒絕協助
(...謝謝標少分享,另外我找到<br />==<br />香港法例 第525章 刑事事宜相互法律协助条例 第5条 拒絕協助<br />(1) 如律政政司司長認為有以下情況,對於由香港以外某地方提出的要求根據本條例提供協助的 請求,須予以拒絕─<br />(b) 該項請求關乎因外地罪行而對某人進行的檢控或懲罰,而該罪行屬政治性質罪行,或 因犯該罪行或被指稱曾犯該罪行的情況,而令致該罪行屬政治性質罪行;<br />(d) 有充分理由相信該項請求提出的目的是基於某人的種族、宗教、國籍或政治見解而對 該人進行檢控、懲罰或以其他方式使該人蒙受不利;<br />(g) 該項請求關乎某作為或不作為,而假使該作為或不作為在香港發生,便不會構成香港罪行。 <br /><br />==<br />似乎香港和內地並沒有定明引渡的條例, 所以很大機會,港人在內地進行反共政治行為,回到香港會沒有事OwOAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12443572452778631649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-13821321667971867262016-04-28T08:09:33.421+10:002016-04-28T08:09:33.421+10:00該條例沒有域外司法管轄權, 返港後沒有法例可檢控, 因為沒有犯港法。間諜/反共宣傳是冷門的課題, 我...該條例沒有域外司法管轄權, 返港後沒有法例可檢控, 因為沒有犯港法。間諜/反共宣傳是冷門的課題, 我沒有深入研究過, 不能肯定講沒有犯法, 有些行為可能免強受《形事罪行條例》涵蓋, 有空我會看下。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-18821158355158661532016-04-28T06:41:37.614+10:002016-04-28T06:41:37.614+10:00正在研究,謝謝指點。想請教一下,該條例中,似乎沒有禁止在外國/外地派發反政府宣傳資料。假如我以個人身...正在研究,謝謝指點。想請教一下,該條例中,似乎沒有禁止在外國/外地派發反政府宣傳資料。假如我以個人身份,在深圳街頭派發反政府宣傳資料;回到香港後高調宣傳自已的事跡,技術上來說,會有問題嗎? <br /><br />條例只是禁止港人參加間碟組織,所以我用個人身份跑到內地反共,應該沒有問題?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12443572452778631649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-53883746008245912692016-04-27T22:35:12.418+10:002016-04-27T22:35:12.418+10:00梗有孖筆3筆抄喇, 孬仔自有方。梗有孖筆3筆抄喇, 孬仔自有方。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-84035493449586488052016-04-27T22:23:15.176+10:002016-04-27T22:23:15.176+10:00我用2枝筆一齊夾住寫, 抄1得2我用2枝筆一齊夾住寫, 抄1得2Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-73353210404767382232016-04-27T22:01:36.270+10:002016-04-27T22:01:36.270+10:00Though they rarely take the initiative to exercise...Though they rarely take the initiative to exercise such discretion, it is not that uncommon. I would have thought the prosecutorial decision should be vested in the hands of the Department of Justice.標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-64664352325890312662016-04-27T18:38:02.661+10:002016-04-27T18:38:02.661+10:00"除非酌情權這東西明文立法並下放至警察,否則輕微罪行的大量檢控仍是無解。"
I..."除非酌情權這東西明文立法並下放至警察,否則輕微罪行的大量檢控仍是無解。"<br /><br />In this day and age, the Police would almost surely be criticised if they exercise discretion and let anyone go. It is unfortunate.Cnoreply@blogger.com