tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post1455543944249883194..comments2024-03-29T16:19:39.762+11:00Comments on 標少札記: 賣藝與行乞標少http://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-82317171363380811852017-10-19T07:42:57.063+11:002017-10-19T07:42:57.063+11:00謝謝, 剛看了。謝謝, 剛看了。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-74666113827315504692017-10-19T02:38:31.275+11:002017-10-19T02:38:31.275+11:00偶爾看到這篇報道:
街頭音樂人的司法抗爭
http://www.inmediahk.net/node...偶爾看到這篇報道:<br />街頭音樂人的司法抗爭<br />http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1052297Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-53595662525561335032017-09-27T23:19:58.532+10:002017-09-27T23:19:58.532+10:00我未見過張表、我未見過張表、標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-86610311135902127322017-09-27T23:19:24.558+10:002017-09-27T23:19:24.558+10:001994年罰款分級制之後, $50屬第1級,即$2000, 算有加價。1994年罰款分級制之後, $50屬第1級,即$2000, 算有加價。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-79661165022171155392017-09-27T23:15:54.539+10:002017-09-27T23:15:54.539+10:00你好熟啫。你好熟啫。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-54136048215056125192017-09-27T23:15:51.814+10:002017-09-27T23:15:51.814+10:00這版本我用不慣。(笑)
其實條文就是:
任何人為了買賣任何物件而叫喊,或為了將其貨物、商品或生意脫手...這版本我用不慣。(笑)<br />其實條文就是:<br />任何人為了買賣任何物件而叫喊,或為了將其貨物、商品或生意脫手,或為了引人注意其貨物、商品或生意而發出任何噪音,可處罰款$50。<br />從條文看,應該真是抓純粹叫賣的。然後,罰50是49年後沒加過價吧?(笑)文少http://jonathanovsky.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-17394393588889993582017-09-27T23:13:14.816+10:002017-09-27T23:13:14.816+10:00又,其實香港有申請玩樂器的牌。(笑)
不過睇張表,似乎係搞一次申請一次那種。
https://www...又,其實香港有申請玩樂器的牌。(笑)<br />不過睇張表,似乎係搞一次申請一次那種。<br />https://www.police.gov.hk/info/doc/licensing/general/en/mip_en.pdf文少http://jonathanovsky.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-89609029198483272092017-09-27T23:12:11.211+10:002017-09-27T23:12:11.211+10:00在悉尼賣藝的人卻不多,在Town Hall附近倒見到幾個傳教似的,在Circular Quay和Ox...在悉尼賣藝的人卻不多,在Town Hall附近倒見到幾個傳教似的,在Circular Quay和Oxford Street也看不到有大媽和busking。反而Darling Harbour每晚有兩三個賣藝的。我猜這可能因為收入不多。Happy Zenithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14648429420215157509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-51862556271553934002017-09-27T23:11:16.133+10:002017-09-27T23:11:16.133+10:00文少, 用這版本: https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/文少, 用這版本: https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-88991169373423367122017-09-27T23:05:04.882+10:002017-09-27T23:05:04.882+10:00其實,賣藝算不算叫賣?(笑)
http://www.hklii.hk/chi/hk/legis/or...其實,賣藝算不算叫賣?(笑)<br />http://www.hklii.hk/chi/hk/legis/ord/228/s6.html文少http://jonathanovsky.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-29027633755838392572017-09-27T20:16:38.381+10:002017-09-27T20:16:38.381+10:00有焦點, 便排除一切, 正是垢病所在.
有焦點, 便排除一切, 正是垢病所在.<br />BBTWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-46422950577298903622017-09-27T16:05:17.157+10:002017-09-27T16:05:17.157+10:00已死無對證, dying declaration is not applicable, 因為死者是自...已死無對證, dying declaration is not applicable, 因為死者是自殺不是兇殺。你那兩個問題要看證據, 有嗎?標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-68333616571984875002017-09-27T15:54:29.749+10:002017-09-27T15:54:29.749+10:00Bill Siu
不如講下內地開發的手機程式WePhone創辦人蘇享茂上周跳樓自殺,死前在其社交帳...Bill Siu<br /><br />不如講下內地開發的手機程式WePhone創辦人蘇享茂上周跳樓自殺,死前在其社交帳戶指控前妻以漏稅不法的事勒索千萬元,感到絕望下尋死<br /><br />WePhone創辦人前妻遭起底疑閃婚4次騙財逾億<br /><br />1)到底前妻是否負法律責任<br />2)涉事女方是否涉騙婚、敲詐勒索? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-25262081212056486342017-09-27T07:13:20.479+10:002017-09-27T07:13:20.479+10:00陳官把焦點放在賣藝不等同行乞, 所以其他也無需考慮。陳官把焦點放在賣藝不等同行乞, 所以其他也無需考慮。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-21078008227332958772017-09-27T07:11:27.220+10:002017-09-27T07:11:27.220+10:00香蕉是上訴人的解釋, 也是案情事實的爭論。香蕉是上訴人的解釋, 也是案情事實的爭論。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-80135993212688460362017-09-27T07:09:51.754+10:002017-09-27T07:09:51.754+10:00這裏市議會對街頭賣藝發牌是有政策和準則的, 借鏡就要睇吓啲人照唔照鏡。這裏市議會對街頭賣藝發牌是有政策和準則的, 借鏡就要睇吓啲人照唔照鏡。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-46595009418814716202017-09-27T07:05:46.180+10:002017-09-27T07:05:46.180+10:00Thanks. I vaguely remember there was an appeal on ...Thanks. I vaguely remember there was an appeal on the issue.標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-13612417789796310972017-09-27T03:42:39.595+10:002017-09-27T03:42:39.595+10:00You meant Immigration.
同意, 兩者既然都受基本法保障, 雖然街頭表演不是基本...You meant Immigration.<br />同意, 兩者既然都受基本法保障, 雖然街頭表演不是基本法所指, 但立例管制、或法院指引, 需要寬鬆而審慎處理。 1仔noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-83333642501352373782017-09-27T03:37:24.940+10:002017-09-27T03:37:24.940+10:00http://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/sea...http://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=100464&QS=%28HCMA92%2F2015%29&TP=JU&currpage=T<br /><br />32. 此條文規管很多行為,但必須在「沒有合法權限或解釋」的情況下才能定罪。<br /><br />This part is important too. Thanks for sharing.<br /><br />TerryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-3906073045121996462017-09-27T03:14:27.493+10:002017-09-27T03:14:27.493+10:00關於發牌...
示威因為不止一人, 主辦者都需要組織, 先取得警務署長許可這行政安排, 安排警力維持...關於發牌...<br />示威因為不止一人, 主辦者都需要組織, 先取得警務署長許可這行政安排, 安排警力維持交通秩序、或反對者的現場秩序, 算合理。<br />然而演奏可能只一個人進行, 且文化藝術表演含即興元素, 若規定如示威的「警務署長許可」, 已顯出不適當。<br />若規定形式更升級為「年度牌照」, 一來太嚴格過不了proportional test、二來過不了憲法規定人人平等這一關。<br />QT vs Emigration 前車可鑑, 不能對「職業演奏玩成年」vs「即興玩一場」作出歧視性分辨標準。<br />B'JAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-66130659512685790222017-09-27T02:53:25.665+10:002017-09-27T02:53:25.665+10:00Oh yes, i missed that, thx.
原審與上訴, IMHO, 都不完美.Oh yes, i missed that, thx.<br />原審與上訴, IMHO, 都不完美.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-43911481132617188342017-09-27T02:51:12.586+10:002017-09-27T02:51:12.586+10:00「大部份控方案情並沒有爭議」乜唔係要三方同意咩? 上訴人都唔同意.
況且香蕉or錢, 錢點來唔係爭譏...「大部份控方案情並沒有爭議」乜唔係要三方同意咩? 上訴人都唔同意.<br />況且香蕉or錢, 錢點來唔係爭譏咩, 香蕉疑惑沒有分析, 紅色盒子也沒有分析.<br />明眼人都知紅色盒子便是乞取施捨道具, 雖然無托盒問賞(求施)情景, 但也算或疑似上訴官口中「器皿」這行乞要件吧? 陳廣池法官沒有分析或要求雙方律師說明這重要元素的道具, 反而緊隨之大筆一輝曰「姑勿論案發時上訴人的紅色盒子內有紙幣或香蕉;姑勿論...明顯地上訴人是正在吹奏東西....」<br />嘩~ 結論先於分析的判詞.BBTWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-24559701244590619852017-09-27T02:45:39.527+10:002017-09-27T02:45:39.527+10:00原審原審Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18313952541462768401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-54802539501044519812017-09-27T02:39:40.774+10:002017-09-27T02:39:40.774+10:00關梁榮宗乜事?關梁榮宗乜事?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-65123946796824842652017-09-27T02:34:57.848+10:002017-09-27T02:34:57.848+10:00點解一開始唔吿(4)(15)?
以前標少都有講過告行乞同在公眾場所玩樂器嘅後果嘅分別。
http...點解一開始唔吿(4)(15)?<br /><br />以前標少都有講過告行乞同在公眾場所玩樂器嘅後果嘅分別。<br /><br />https://billsiu.blogspot.hk/2017/01/blog-post_30.html#comment-form<br /><br />個判詞講到乜香蕉,都唔知有乜關係。。<br /><br />Terry<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com