tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post1342591834488064758..comments2024-03-28T16:48:55.464+11:00Comments on 標少札記: 翻看閉路電視查案標少http://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-91955876125876373232016-07-25T15:08:49.341+10:002016-07-25T15:08:49.341+10:00Well, if the informant is too vague, I don't t...Well, if the informant is too vague, I don't think the police will classify it as theft. If the informant says for sure, then it is different.標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-78121615245153672452016-07-25T15:02:50.117+10:002016-07-25T15:02:50.117+10:00in case there is an informant suspecting his phone...in case there is an informant suspecting his phone being stolen without strong evidence (e.g. no witness, the inft. not sure about where the phone is lost/stolen), should the police classify it as 'theft case' and hand over to CID for further investigation?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-67607496395894847802016-07-25T14:41:22.016+10:002016-07-25T14:41:22.016+10:00店方如果講明不與警察合作所以刪除影片, 會屬妨礙司法公正, 但佢講唔覺意洗咗, 就無符。店方如果講明不與警察合作所以刪除影片, 會屬妨礙司法公正, 但佢講唔覺意洗咗, 就無符。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-70774024397249733512016-07-25T14:37:15.943+10:002016-07-25T14:37:15.943+10:00標少, 再有一問
若店方在警方申請手令前刪除閉路電視片段 構成犯罪嗎?
thanks!標少, 再有一問 <br />若店方在警方申請手令前刪除閉路電視片段 構成犯罪嗎?<br /><br />thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-85075578361445579582016-05-14T17:46:43.926+10:002016-05-14T17:46:43.926+10:00總共5單, 紅牌因為唔使錢。總共5單, 紅牌因為唔使錢。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-62129164431215807722016-05-14T13:52:24.087+10:002016-05-14T13:52:24.087+10:00紅牌阿標/ 紅牌標姑 :)紅牌阿標/ 紅牌標姑 :)蛋散noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-82749691429048907802016-05-12T23:44:15.922+10:002016-05-12T23:44:15.922+10:00The prosecution can enter nolle prosequi at any ti...The prosecution can enter nolle prosequi at any time of the proceeding. There is no bar to a new indictment.今日好似紅牌阿姑, 客仔多到應接不暇, 有4單求助, email來來回回, 留言又多, 疲於奔命。<br />標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-89527149999610092272016-05-12T23:35:44.260+10:002016-05-12T23:35:44.260+10:00我搞錯咗,一 D 都唔出奇。
你以上兩粒疑似拉丁文我看不懂啊。
我搞錯咗,一 D 都唔出奇。<br /><br />你以上兩粒疑似拉丁文我看不懂啊。<br />蛋散noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-73231902879602708012016-05-12T23:29:04.564+10:002016-05-12T23:29:04.564+10:00裁判官無權left on file, 只有地院或以上才可。如果裁判法院這樣做, 我斗膽話佢錯, 因為...裁判官無權left on file, 只有地院或以上才可。如果裁判法院這樣做, 我斗膽話佢錯, 因為裁判官要hear and determine the case, left on file is not a determination.唔ONE, 唔withdraw就只有enter nolle prosequi.你會唔會搞錯咗標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-52511131575376533262016-05-12T23:15:10.354+10:002016-05-12T23:15:10.354+10:00明白了。
平時在庭上見到有些案件唔繼續告,但又唔 dismiss 又唔 withdraw,話要放在...明白了。<br /><br />平時在庭上見到有些案件唔繼續告,但又唔 dismiss 又唔 withdraw,話要放在 file 裏,未得法庭批准就不得再挖出來,其實係咪只是門面功夫,其實根本不會再告?蛋散noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-52221187102441491292016-05-12T12:27:28.341+10:002016-05-12T12:27:28.341+10:00Generally speaking, for a D court and High case, t...Generally speaking, for a D court and High case, the police has to seek legal advice because the selection of venue of trial is vested in DoJ. For mag case, if the police has doubts about the strength of evidence or appropriateness of charges, then legal advice is sought. Otherwise than that, the police can decide what to do with the case. 標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-49526371240893164972016-05-12T00:40:01.433+10:002016-05-12T00:40:01.433+10:00在庭上常常聽見控方說要去 DOJ 拿 legal advice,其實警方查案、落 charge至到上...在庭上常常聽見控方說要去 DOJ 拿 legal advice,其實警方查案、落 charge至到上庭,跟 DOJ 是如何合作的呢? 警方是否有懷疑,不肯定應該如何處理才問 DOJ 還是想把波抛給別人才問 DOJ 呢?蛋散noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-68602923417262766462016-05-06T20:42:12.251+10:002016-05-06T20:42:12.251+10:00These are the "procedures" everyone is f...These are the "procedures" everyone is facing in every industry nowaday, face it, or leave itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-26504989691373975402016-05-05T11:43:37.678+10:002016-05-05T11:43:37.678+10:00會搵軍裝去睇帶
睇唔到就唔開
而且就算開咗又點
影唔到嘅盜竊案,甚至影到但冇記認(例如疑犯有八達通...會搵軍裝去睇帶<br />睇唔到就唔開<br /><br />而且就算開咗又點<br />影唔到嘅盜竊案,甚至影到但冇記認(例如疑犯有八達通購買記錄)嘅<br />咪又係將個file收櫃底<br />隔個月拎出嚟寫句冇新發現<br />之後又收翻埋佢<br /><br />唔通好似查謀殺咁<br />攞電訊公司記錄,鎖定有咩人喺條街經過<br />再派數十人睇晒前後五條街cctv<br />睇下事用同咩人接觸過<br />雖然警察成日話案無大小<br />但肯定冇可能乜嘢都當謀殺查<br /><br />大家明知冇用嘅事<br />點解要搵嘢嚟做<br />也是這個原因<br />警察根本不想受理Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-32063734739836050662016-05-05T00:45:32.466+10:002016-05-05T00:45:32.466+10:00講多句:前年警察向Facebook提出近一萬次要求提供協助,結果:回覆咗一次!
張warrant搜查...講多句:前年警察向Facebook提出近一萬次要求提供協助,結果:回覆咗一次!<br />張warrant搜查地點打何處:美國!可以嗎?<br /><br />世界難撈!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-68034911657550053152016-05-05T00:06:45.127+10:002016-05-05T00:06:45.127+10:00咪突然間講到警察咁無辦法, search warrant嘛, 唔合作你嘛同search下囉。我走咗咁...咪突然間講到警察咁無辦法, search warrant嘛, 唔合作你嘛同search下囉。我走咗咁多年, 可能離晒地。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-68003324856586936812016-05-04T23:49:27.824+10:002016-05-04T23:49:27.824+10:00下一個問題:
你為什麼肯定?
一般而言,如苦主實牙實齒,店東為免得失客人,都會願意協助。但如苦主只...下一個問題:<br />你為什麼肯定?<br /><br />一般而言,如苦主實牙實齒,店東為免得失客人,都會願意協助。但如苦主只係想試吓睇唔睇倒?店東通常都不會合作。<br /><br />話分兩頭,時代已不同。十年前,警察話要即時睇,店東一定俾。現在的店東只會藉口一大堆:唔識用部機啦、唔識翻播啦、部機無翻播功能啦、部機無錄影功能啦、要約技術員來攪啦、技術員要下星期先得閒喎、只係幫你燒碟喎,你返寫字樓慢慢睇啦、燒七日片段俾你,但係統無set時間或set錯時間,你警察自己想辦法啦、片段係MP4檔案,但就無電腦睇到,技術員又話幫你唔到啦!翻睇多次後,先發覺燒錯日子時間啦!燒碟時,技術員按錯鍵刪除曬片段啦、技術故障刪除咗不知原因啦!<br /><br />哈哈!總之人人都認為警察而家大囇、或者有張warrant大囇,唔知而家大把律師政客日日一齊夾計玩九警察!<br /><br />又,警察而家揸張warrant向大公司攞料,最耐試過要等七個月。唔滿意?公司後勤支援部喺上海喎,你鍾意咪攞張warrant去上海Q囉!<br />人人都堅離地!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-47792211444886958132016-05-04T22:39:07.471+10:002016-05-04T22:39:07.471+10:00我當然明白你的講法, 如果我報案肯定在店內失竊, 咁開唔開CCR?我當然明白你的講法, 如果我報案肯定在店內失竊, 咁開唔開CCR?標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-21251846824140742742016-05-04T22:25:05.077+10:002016-05-04T22:25:05.077+10:00可以解說點解警方唔肯立案同睇CCTV
因為事主根本唔肯定幾時,喺邊到唔見電話
事主亦都見唔到有任何...可以解說點解警方唔肯立案同睇CCTV<br /><br />因為事主根本唔肯定幾時,喺邊到唔見電話<br />事主亦都見唔到有任何人攞佢電話<br />事主連感覺個袋有人掂過都冇<br />在警察角度看, 事件不涉刑事, 只是一宗"遺失物品"事件<br />一日好長, 事主講得喺A地點唔見, 搵唔到自然可以講晒全日行程, 喺B地點至Z地點<br />警察冇可能無止境幫佢搵失物<br />所以一開始就唔立案<br />可以想像相同情況發生喺CY身上, 警察又派人去查的話<br />一定又會見報上頭條話"濫用職權"<br /><br />雖然類比一定會失真<br />亦都相信好多人唔同意<br />但由警察來看, 今次事件等同:<br />1) 某君欠債好耐唔還, 債主報警, 話人地"盜竊"<br />2) 同女朋友嘈交, 女朋友唔肯見佢,又唔聽電話, 於是去警署報"失蹤人口"<br />警察冇能會接受這類報案,更加唔會派人去查<br /><br />PS: 雖然我做警察時,呢種簡單事件都會幫佢睇一睇(廢事煩),但不是對所有警察都是必然<br />PS2: 根本唔成案,就算想攞法庭搜令,法官相信都唔會簽Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-21193325734382831122016-05-04T15:54:08.911+10:002016-05-04T15:54:08.911+10:00Jamie,
Your link leads me to the radio website bu...Jamie,<br /><br />Your link leads me to the radio website but I don't know which case you referred me to. Could you be more specific so that I may make a comment?標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-17345582101804976372016-05-04T13:05:09.863+10:002016-05-04T13:05:09.863+10:00http://www.crhk.com.hk/Page/ZH-TW/newsdetail.aspx?...http://www.crhk.com.hk/Page/ZH-TW/newsdetail.aspx?ItemId=855404&csid=261_341<br /><br />『裁判官指,今次案件各被告使用過激行為,但不是同類案件中最嚴重,同時考慮各被告承認有做相關行為,也願意承擔法律後果,即使部分被告無認罪,都可以被視為有悔意。裁判官認為可以給予他們機會,所以判社會服務令。』<br /><br />除左認罪, 仲有咩途徑會令裁判官認為犯人有悔意?至少我睇唔到果幾個人會賠償,道歉之類.<br />標少點睇? <br /><br />JamieJamiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17019810482241623632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-4500658036735610342016-05-04T07:42:54.350+10:002016-05-04T07:42:54.350+10:00Take the law into your own hand is very dangerous....Take the law into your own hand is very dangerous. It is fair to say the standard and efficiency of the HK police is far better their counterpart in Australia.標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-29379507611229790272016-05-04T07:39:39.633+10:002016-05-04T07:39:39.633+10:00不能排除這可能性。那張報案紙其實可能對失物保險的申索才用得着。不能排除這可能性。那張報案紙其實可能對失物保險的申索才用得着。標少https://www.blogger.com/profile/09140798187543833983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-11103236801724848362016-05-04T02:20:26.473+10:002016-05-04T02:20:26.473+10:00If the police does not enforce the law according t...If the police does not enforce the law according to the common people's wishes, they would (or be forced to) have to take the law into their own hands.<br /><br />PHLIAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3459094382106008140.post-31706534609596172262016-05-03T23:57:05.485+10:002016-05-03T23:57:05.485+10:00陣間間舖被無端"被公審"就慘了.....陣間間舖被無端"被公審"就慘了.....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com