2016年10月1日星期六

上庭浮一大白

Barrister handed £500 fine for turning up to court ‘under the influence’ of alcohol

An experienced barrister has been handed a £500 fine by the regulator after turning up to court “under the influence” of alcohol.

According to a Bar Standards Board (BSB) disciplinary finding published this week, Christopher Ellison — who was called to the bar in 2001 — attended Bournemouth Magistrates’ Court last September having “consumed” alcohol.

The BSB stated in its finding that Ellison, who was at court to represent a client, had “behaved in a way likely to diminish the trust and confidence the public places in the profession”.

According to the report, later that day the Bournemouth-based barrister left the same client “unrepresented”, having exited the court prior to the “resumption of an adjourned sentencing hearing”.

Ellison — who according to his LinkedIn spent time as a “top currency trader for a very large bank” before joining the bar — was slapped with a £500 fine and given a reprimand from the leader of his circuit, Bill Mousley QC.

Elsewhere, a fare dodging non-practising barrister has been disbarred.

Dr Peter Barnett, who evaded fares worth up to £19,000 over a two-and-a-half year period, was convicted of six offences of fraud by misrepresentation at Westminster Magistrates’ Court last year. Barnett, 45, from Thame in Oxfordshire, was handed a 16 week custodial sentence, suspended for 12 months, and ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid work.

The Oxford graduate — who was called to the bar in 2007 — is also a qualified solicitor.

A spokesperson for the BSB said:

Dishonest conduct is incompatible with membership of the bar. The tribunal’s decision to disbar Dr Barnett reflects this.

Speaking to The Times newspaper, a spokesperson for the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) revealed that Barnett had removed himself from the roll seven years ago, and therefore is no longer within its regulatory remit.

(Legal Cheek 28/9/2016)

大狀醉酒上庭紀律聆訊後被判罰500鎊, 即是5000港元, 真係好輕手啫, 如果發生在香港, 釘牌一年半載都好平常。不過各處標準不同, 飲酒文化深厚的地方自然把醉酒看得較寬鬆。香港律師醉酒上庭, 我搜索枯腸也想不起例子, 法官醉酒我反而想起三幾個, 都是多年前的事, 那些年是洋官天下, 唐人法官比例上少, 這些事都涉及老外。一個是在區域法院內庭酗酒, 庭都開唔到, 搞到好大鑊, 因為街知巷聞, 上級也採取行動, 不過那些年, 制度寬鬆, 並無正式紀律聆訊那回事, 很多問題都可拆掂。我只是聽聞其事, 並無內幕。另一個大老爺是裁判官, 有一次宿醉開庭, 步履不穩, 出庭行了幾步未走到官櫈就倒地, 條友後來辭官私人執業, 最終暴斃於渡輪上。這個我也不是目睹, 只是可靠人士相告。我講可靠人士當然是大內人馬。第三個我就不只一次身歷其境, 大老爺臉紅如關公, 呼氣也可以把標少薰醉, 大內侍衛爆料, 老爺自認徹夜暢飲無眠, 在庭上舌頭也打了結, 思考反應都遲了幾拍。尚好, 出庭還可以行到直線, 也無倒地。更加好彩的是, 沒有酒量的標少沒有給薰醉。這些事都發生在殖民地時代。九七後, 你想死易過, 記者多, 法官地位下降, 少了一個敬畏老外法官如敬畏耶和華的因素, 行差踏錯, 見光死。我想, 做官的也眷戀英國管治時代, 唔使拍驚堂木, 蟻民貼貼服服, 無人駁嘴。時移世易, 法官何止唔敢醉酒上庭, 官民易位, 口口聲聲罵你狗官都得。揮舞龍獅旗班友, 又有無想過時光倒流, 現在擁有的東西, 以前不曾擁有。以前蟻民可申請司法覆核嗎? 發夢呀你! 上庭可以侃侃而談, 呼喝證人, 還可以陳辭三五七日嗎? 幻想喇你。大老爺一句 Shut up and sit down, 未叫你get out, 你魂魄已飛到九霄。別一味幻想那些年的風光, 有些只是選擇性的遐想。浮一大白, 早抖啦。

13 則留言:

  1. 香港律師醉酒上庭, Roderick Murray?
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2004-08-11/drunken-hong-kong-lawyer-suspended-from-duty/2023416

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. Oh, thanks. It happened when I had left HK. Now it rings a bell.

      刪除
  2. http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20160930/bkn-20160930164154927-0930_00822_001.html
    Any comments on this?
    Absolute discharge without compensation order means she's pocketing the public money she defrauded from the government without any consequence... And she's already not charged with using anothers' ID. I think CP should have stood his ground for compensation order even if it was before Ernest Lin.

    回覆刪除
  3. http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20160930/mobile/bkn-20160930164154927-0930_00822_001.html

    "有關節病患的76歲老婦,在丈夫去世後翌日,發現丈夫遺下3張未用的醫療券,認為「用得唔好嘥」,往診所用醫療券換3樽鈣片自用,但事後被衞生署揭發。她被控一項欺詐罪,辯方曾要求准她自簽守行為了事,但律政司決定繼續檢控她,令她嚇到「騰騰震」。老婦今日(30日)承認控罪,裁判官練錦鴻罕有地判她無條件釋放,更加不用她賠錢,她可取回全數保釋金,之後喜極而泣。 "

    又係練官

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. On the face of it, Ernest Lin was playing tricks because of prosecution's refusal to ONE. I would associate this with his limelight case of putting the police inspector on the witness stand to explain why a witness summons was not served on the witness leading to the dropping of the charge. I will write a piece after I have collected information from my different sources.

      刪除
  4. 樓上既新聞你已經知道
    本想同你分享一下
    我見到法庭法官 庭外開恩
    我呢啲小市民見到呢件事都感到恩惠

    回覆刪除
  5. 這個大律師之後再醉酒鬧事倒還可以自簽守行為,法官是否要問一下為什麼有精神病還可以做檢控大律師?
    刑毁大律師自揭精神病撤起訴
    文章日期:2005年3月23日
    http://life.mingpao.com/cfm/dailynews3b.cfm?File=20050323/nalge/gea1.txt

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 在大律師名冊已找不到他的名字。

      刪除
  6. I wonder where is this Counsel Lawyer Barrister Roderick Graham Murray person now? Changed his name? Got locked up somewhere? Or died?

    回覆刪除
  7. Bill Siu, 飲醉酒嚴重啲定叫雞嚴重啲?

    http://the-sun.on.cc/channels/news/20060912/20060912024959_0000.html

    今個月內因為兩度召妓及大玩「一王兩后」,導致下體流血的男子身份終於曝光。他名叫朱德 (Barrister Chu Tak),擁有大律師資格,擅打民事訴訟,自稱最愛召妓,揚言即使下體曾受創也會繼續風流。這名大狀數年前突然減接案件,轉職金融股票炒賣,更懶理世俗人眼光,有時僅穿內衣褲出街購物,怪異行為令人側目,卻仍堅持我行我素,不過,對於有指他服了春藥玩一王兩后,他卻是很執幵地說:我無食春藥,去醫院只不過係下體出血⺊。朱德與中國十大元帥朱德同名,喜歡人家叫他「大元帥」,他承認很愛召妓。作為大狀,他也清楚知道在港召妓並非違法,因此毫不忌諱這個嗜好,他誇口說:「玩一王兩后、起雙飛一定無問題,我前兩次入醫院,唔係食春藥而起,我根本無食任何春藥,只不過係下體流血先送院。」

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 橙和蘋果的比較, 朱德當時應該不續牌了。他執業時, 對著被告粗口爛舌罵人家的娘, 開庭時也罵得頗大聲, 這人的行為頗有問題。

      刪除
  8. http://the-sun.on.cc/channels/news/20060912/20060912024959_0000.html

    朱德直認,他與前妻也是在灣仔杜老誌夜總會認識,後來因意見不合離婚,前妻現時已是股票行經紀。他分析,平日召妓的次數與經濟狀況掛漖,「如果炒股有斬獲,每周召妓幾次,否則會自慰解決。」

    朱德為澄清自己是「有能人士」,他突然在記者面前脫下褲子,又呼喚由他飼養的狗隻來舔舐下體,場面令人惡心。朱德曾以大律師身份去信醫院管理局主席胡定旭致謝東區醫院精神科的醫護人員照顧周到,而東區醫院亦有回覆多謝。不過他在訪問期間並未正面承認自己有精神病。

    => Was Counsel Lawyer Barrister Chu Tak a mentally ill person?

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. Haha, he was not my personal friend. From the media report, I would have thought he was.

      刪除